The phrase "ascribed to the difference" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when attributing a particular quality, characteristic, or outcome to a specific difference or variation in context.
Example: "The success of the project can be ascribed to the difference in team collaboration compared to previous efforts."
Alternatives: "attributed to the difference" or "assigned to the difference".
The difference in surface viscoelastic properties measured by ECWD and by surface quasi-elastic light scattering (SLS) was ascribed to the difference in monolayer response to waves of different wavelengths.
Because the effects of DA and OA receptor antagonists on memory recall were studied after two-trial appetitive conditioning and six-trial aversive conditioning, it could be argued that different effects of OA and DA receptor antagonists are ascribed to the difference in the number of trials.
The process began to be widely recognised seven years ago, during the Confederations Cup, in which Germany practised hosting the World Cup with a coltish willingness to attack that some of us ascribed to the difference in personality between Klinsmann and, say, the old-school graduate Berti Vogts, who had managed his country to ultimate triumph over the Czechs at Wembley in 1996.
The growth texture can be ascribed to the difference in the surface energy.
It can be ascribed to the difference of porosity between residual layer and line-nanopatterns.
This deviation could be mainly ascribed to the difference of activation energy between YY and NN.
These different cellular behaviors cited above can be partially ascribed to the differences of properties for different carbon nanomaterials-surface area, pore structure, particle size, length, diameter and curvature, and partially ascribed to different cell types.
Such differences in the stress distribution could be ascribed to the differences in the constrained conditions at the interfaces of adjacent components under various sealing designs.
Distinct different voiding mechanisms observed for the PBE- and PP-containing blends were ascribed to the differences in the dispersed phase elastic moduli and deformability.
Out of these, three amino acids substitutions (at positions 30, 50 and 627) were specific to the HTM when compared to WT and Nipponbare, while eight changes (at positions 11, 67, 71, 293, 318, 357, 400 and 643), could be ascribed to the differences in subspecies – japonica vs. aus genotypes (WT and HTM).
The associated differences in LVEF may be ascribed to the differences in infarct size.
