Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Discrepancies between the conclusions of different meta-analyses (quantitative syntheses of systematic reviews) are often ascribed to methodological differences.
The aim of this study was to examine population-based regional or national data from five high-resource countries in order to investigate incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AFE and to investigate whether any variation identified could be ascribed to methodological differences between the studies.
The aim of this study was to examine population-based regional or national data within five high resource countries in order to investigate incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AFE and to investigate whether any variation identified could be ascribed to methodological differences between the studies.
Similar(57)
The differences between the results in Perrin and collaborators' and the present study may partly be ascribed to methodological factors.
This in part is due to the different definitions ascribed to GISA and hGISA that are subject to methodological differences and variations in (clinical) breakpoints and cut-off values [ 12, 13].
Also, due to methodological differences, the impacts they intend to capture are different.
This reply contends that much of this disagreement is attributable to methodological differences.
Part of the difference in values may be due to methodological differences in the surveys.
These minor differences compared to primate data could be merely due to methodological differences between studies.
The slight difference is due to methodological differences.
The discrepancy in findings might be attributed to methodological differences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com