Sentence examples for ascribed to individual from inspiring English sources

Some propose a compromise according to which the kind of intrinsic value that can sensibly be ascribed to individual objects like frying pans is not the same kind of intrinsic value that is the topic of this article and can sensibly be ascribed to items of the sort on Frankena's list (cf. Bradley 2006).

Second, and most importantly, it identified that at lower CTC, characteristic systematic and random errors could be ascribed to individual analysts.

Stock origin was ascribed to individual fish by a combination of DNA analyses (Beacham et al. 1995) and the recovery of radio transmitters at spawning grounds.

Because recorded ultrasonic vocalizations could not be ascribed to individual rats and instead had to be assigned to each condition, all rats tested at one time in one room were always from the same condition.

On the other hand, possible effects of the study cannot be ascribed to individual interventions, but rather are the result of the total intervention program combined with changes motivated by external factors, including campaigns initiated by the local government, or regional public health offices.

It may have been planned as a protest demonstration, but if summary executions of captured U.N. staff occurred as reported, those particular acts cannot be ascribed to individuals who are "protesters".

Ascriptive characteristics are those that are ascribed to individuals independently of their choice and include being of the same nation or being a "distinct people".

One of the main results of this paper is that the spatial patterns previously ascribed to individuals that 'pay attention' to the proximity of their nestmates, can also be produced when individuals do not directly account for the proximity of nestmates.

Data on NS-SEC are only available from special surveys and the Townsend score, as an example of an area deprivation index, is an unsatisfactory measure when ascribed to individuals due to ecological bias.

For Hook, rights were ascribed to the individual and not to individuals as members of majority or minority groups.

We believe that this is possible as long as, first, the influence on an individual's attitudes cannot be causally ascribed to another individual but only to the collective as a whole and, second, there is a sufficient degree of consistency between the collective's actions before and after the causal influence on the individual's attitudes has been exerted.