Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
ascribe with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "ascribe with" is not grammatically correct in written English.
A more correct phrase would be "ascribe to" or "attribute to." These phrases are used to indicate that something is being assigned or attributed to someone or something. Correct sentence: I can ascribe my success to my hard work and determination. Incorrect sentence: I can ascribe with my success.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
"Global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and observed warming..
News & Media
"The global warming now is large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause-and-effect relationship to the greenhouse effect... Our computer climate simulations indicate that the greenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves".
News & Media
It is a tried and true tactic: floating an idea to which you claim to not personally ascribe, with the effect of getting the idea to circulate.
News & Media
According to Erik M. Conway, global warming became the dominant popular term after June 1988, when NASA climate scientist James Hansen used the term in a testimony to Congress when he said: "global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming".
Wiki
Although it is not possible to ascribe with certainty the found CD133 expression in PBMC to CEPs or to other progenitor cells, our findings may cautiously represent a possible future molecular biomarker of metronomic chemotherapy.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
Like the food of Easter and other religious festivals, many of the dishes are ascribed with symbolic significance.
News & Media
Several very early texts cannot be ascribed with certainty to any of the individual languages listed above but show linguistic features of a broadly Osco-Umbrian/South Picene type.
Encyclopedias
But awkwardly, the main traditions of scholarship and jurisprudence in Islam both the Shia school and the four main Sunni ones draw on Hadiths (words and deeds ascribed with varying credibility to Muhammad) to argue in support of death for apostates.
News & Media
The meliorative durability was ascribed with well-structured Pt-Te nanoparticles and Pt-increase skin generated from dealloying process.
Science
This ion was ascribed with the chemical composition of C29H28O10Cl ([M+Cl]−) based on its high accordance in both accuracy (0.7 mDa) and isotopic abundance (83.9%) with those of the theoretical values.
Feral urban pigeons (which we shall refer to as urban pigeons) are found in all major cities around the world (del Hoyo et al.2005) and are today the birds with the closest contact to people in cities; currently, these pigeons are mostly ascribed with a highly negative image (Vuorisalo et al.2001).2001
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "ascribe to" or "attribute to" instead of "ascribe with" for grammatically correct writing. This ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretations.
Common error
Avoid using "with" after "ascribe". The correct preposition to use is "to". Incorrect: "ascribe with"; Correct: "ascribe to".
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "ascribe with" functions as part of a verb phrase where the intention is to attribute or assign something to someone or something. However, it is considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies the correct form as using the preposition "to" instead of "with".
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "ascribe with" appears in some sources, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""ascribe to"" or "attribute to". Ludwig AI clearly indicates the error, so it's best to avoid "ascribe with" to ensure clear and correct communication. The phrase aims to convey attribution, but the non-standard usage undermines its effectiveness. Always prioritize "ascribe to" for accuracy.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
ascribe to
Replaces "with" with "to", correcting the grammatical structure for proper attribution.
attribute to
Offers a synonym for "ascribe" and uses the correct preposition "to" for grammatical accuracy.
associate with
Indicates a connection or relationship, rather than direct attribution.
connect with
Suggests a link or bond, less formal than "ascribe" and focused on association.
charge with
Implies assigning a responsibility or task, which is a more specific form of attribution.
designate as
Focuses on formally assigning a role or characteristic.
impute to
Suggests attributing something, often negative, to someone or something.
credit with
Gives recognition or praise for something.
link to
Emphasizes a connection or association, often used in scientific or technical contexts.
consider as
Presents something as being viewed or regarded in a certain way.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "ascribe" in a sentence?
The correct way to use "ascribe" is with the preposition "to", not "with". For example, "I can "ascribe to" my success to my hard work" is correct.
What can I say instead of "ascribe with"?
Instead of "ascribe with", you should use ""ascribe to"" or "attribute to". These are the grammatically correct alternatives.
Is "ascribe with" grammatically correct?
No, "ascribe with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is ""ascribe to"".
What's the difference between "ascribe to" and "attribute to"?
"Ascribe to" and "attribute to" are often used interchangeably. Both mean to regard something as being caused by someone or something. However, "attribute" can sometimes imply a more definite assignment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested