Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
For standardized codes, such as ICD-9 and Current Procedural Terminology codes, the codes are ascertained to be valid for the time period the patient record is reported.
Similar(59)
They appeared to be valid.
This inference would appear to be valid.
Moreover, this argument appears to be valid.
These seem to be valid concerns.
The URL will need to be valid.
There appears to be no obvious way to choose between the candidates and to ascertain which are valid as the conclusions differ depending on the selected criterion.
As was the case for DGRF-2010 and IGRF-2015, there are clearly features in some models which are not in consensus with others, though it is impossible to ascertain which are valid.
However, further studies are required to ascertain whether these proposals are valid and to also evaluate nutritional status/food security in this particular population.
Further genetic analyses, including more coding regions, could help to ascertain whether these hypotheses are valid and to understand how mutations spread within individuals and became fixed in populations of these asexuals.
Unfortunately, many investigators find it difficult to ascertain which SES measures are valid, which can be applied to multiple outcomes, and which measure is the most effective with a specific condition.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com