The phrase "as without merit" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something lacks value, justification, or validity in a particular context.
Example: "The committee found the proposal to be as without merit, leading them to reject it unanimously."
Alternatives: "deemed unworthy" or "considered baseless".
In 1984, a probate judge dismissed the suit as "without merit".
He dismissed other defense arguments seeking an order of acquittal or a new trial as "without merit".
Lawyers for Goddard, who directed the 1987 children's fantasy Masters of the Universe, described Egan's suit as "without merit" in an email to the Hollywood Reporter.
In an emailed statement, Stone dismissed the lawsuits as "without merit" and argued the lawyers who filed them "could face sanctions".
Emily Heffter, a spokeswoman for Zillow, dismissed Andersen's litigation as "without merit". A publicly traded real estate marketing company based in Seattle, Zillow has been offering Zestimates since 2006.
Kalanick's spokesperson described the lawsuit as "without merit". There are seven newcomers on the list and two more who returned after falling off in 2016.
Banking officials released statements describing the cases as "baseless" and "without merit".
A Grimm spokeswoman characterized the allegations as "baseless" and "without merit," and Grimm himself has continually denied any wrongdoing.
Microsoft executives said yesterday that the suits were "without merit". And indeed, as the Federal District Court in Washington begins considering these lawsuits, the Justice Department and the states will need to overcome ambiguities in the antitrust laws that could work to the company's advantage.
So fast have the transformations been in the last 15 years that the Justice Department's antitrust suit against Microsoft now seems as quaint as an antitrust suit it once brought against I.B.M. (which it dropped as being "without merit" in 1982).
Scroll down to see the full letter, which was posted at TMZ. Unfortunately for the Spurs and George Hill, a lawyer for TheDirty.com shot back, dismissing a Spurs argument as "totally without merit" and calling the team "not so sophisticated" as TheDirty.com readers.
