as was as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as was as" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It appears to be a mistake or a misphrasing, as it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "As was as expected, the results were disappointing." (This example is incorrect due to the phrase itself.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Indeed, if he had died of the plague, as was as likely as not, after writing only two plays and some poems, I wonder if we would not now have to suppress a laugh when we heard his name in class.

BBC

The association between the need for orthodontic treatment (DAI) and the child's satisfaction with chewing was not significant, suggesting that malocclusion has no direct impact on the perception of masticatory function, as was as also observed by Tessarollo et al. [20].

Progress in Orthodontics

Le Serres was captured by 'C' Company, 4th Battalion, as was as the bridge over the River Naturby on the road to Le Muy.

Wikipedia

For example, several glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferases (enzymes involved in protein glycosylation) were induced, as was as Sec24B, a component of the COPII protein complex required for vesicle budding from the ER.

Plosone

This was identified by visually inspecting the disappearance of bands, as was as the point the binding curve for the diglycosylated PrPsc band intersected the background density of the particular blot.

Plosone

29 Increasing severity of AS was, as expected, 30 associated with higher prevalence of LV hypertrophy and more concentric geometry (table 2).

Heart

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

He was as good as they were.

The Economist

She was as happy as can be".

The New York Times - Magazine

It was as extravagant as can be".

The New Yorker

"He was as nutty as could be".

The New Yorker

It was as scared as I was".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase “as was as” in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect and does not convey a clear meaning. Instead, use more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "as expected" or "as it was" to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Common error

Do not repeat words unnecessarily in a phrase. The structure "as was as" often leads to unclear and grammatically incorrect sentences. Opt for concise expressions that maintain clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as was as" is grammatically incorrect and does not have a recognized function in standard English. The Ludwig AI confirms its incorrectness, suggesting it's a mistake or misphrasing. It's advisable to use correct alternatives depending on the context.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as was as" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as a mistake or misphrasing, emphasizing its lack of clarity and proper grammatical structure. While there are a few examples found across various sources, they do not validate its correctness. Instead, use alternatives such as "as expected" or "as it was" depending on the intended meaning to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. The usage patterns suggest that the phrase appears, albeit incorrectly, across different contexts such as science, news media and wikis, but that doesn't make it right. Always aim for precise and grammatically sound expressions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as it was

Replaces the repeated 'as' to correct grammatical structure indicating a previous state or condition.

as expected

Indicates something happened in a predictable manner, omitting the redundant 'was as'.

as previously

Indicates a prior condition or state, correcting the original phrasing.

similarly

Expresses a parallel situation or action, avoiding the original phrase's grammatical issue.

in the same way

Highlights a comparable manner of doing something without the grammatical error.

as with

Draws a parallel between situations, correcting the original phrase's mistake.

also

Adds additional information, acting as a simple conjunction instead of the flawed phrase.

just as

Introduces a comparison while avoiding the ungrammatical repetition.

correspondingly

Expresses a matching or related manner, resolving the grammatical problem.

likewise

Indicates a similar action or situation, serving as a corrected alternative.

FAQs

Is "as was as" grammatically correct?

No, "as was as" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning in standard English. It often appears as a result of a writing mistake. It's better to use alternatives such as "as expected" or "as it was" depending on the intended meaning.

What can I use instead of "as was as"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "as expected" if you're referring to something that was anticipated, or "as it was" to describe a previous state or condition. Other options include "similarly" or "in the same way".

How does "as expected" differ from "as was as"?

"As expected" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something happened in a predictable manner. "As was as" is grammatically incorrect and should not be used. Alternatives like "as it was" could be suitable to describe a previous state.

In what contexts might I mistakenly use "as was as"?

You might mistakenly use "as was as" when trying to express a comparison or similarity, or when trying to describe a situation that remains unchanged from a prior state. However, it's crucial to replace it with a grammatically correct alternative such as "just as" or "as it was" to ensure clear communication.