as validated in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as validated in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a source or document that confirms or supports a statement or finding. Example: "The results of the study were significant, as validated in the recent research published in the journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

Overall, the interviewer-administered CES-D scale, as validated in this study, was a reliable and valid instrument for screening for prenatal depression among pregnant women attending ANC services in northern Uganda.

BMC Psychiatry

To identify and quantify depression symptoms, subjects completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), as validated in Brazilian Portuguese.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

This paper presents an alternative, and complementary, approach that exploits controlled plastic deformation in the precursors, as validated in a comprehensive set of experimental and theoretical studies.

Extreme Mechanics Letters

Larger studies are needed to explore the clinical benefits of scanning during therapy, e.g., for evaluating interlesional differences within a single patient, preferably using TBR as validated in the current study.

EJNMMI Research

As the connectivity between peers remains unchanged in each cycle, the average number of copies of an information frame that a peer receives is bounded by the fanout, as validated in our result.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

Hepatic systemic clearance of 18F-FDGal (ml blood/ml liver tissue/min) was calculated according to the Gjedde-Patlak representation of data [7,8] as validated in previous studies [1-3].

EJNMMI Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

True positives (TP) were defined as experimentally validated in-silico predictions; false negatives (FN) are the experimentally validated interactions but not predicted in-silico, and the false positives (FP) are defined as in-silico predictions that were not experimentally validated.

BMC Genomics

The exercise step test is not as well validated in COPD as the 6 minute walk test or the shuttle walk test [ 29, 30].

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

As will be validated in the following, the LP relaxation-based algorithm reduces computational complexity compared to the greedy search-based algorithm.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The performance of CLIF-SOFA has not as yet been validated in cohorts other than the initial one from which it was derived.

American Journal of Gastroenterology

However, it is important to note that RRS score as developed and validated in Guttman et al., 2013 is not applicable for this specific purpose.

eLife

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "as validated in", always cite the specific source (study, experiment, etc.) that provides the validation to maintain credibility and allow readers to verify the information.

Common error

Avoid using "as validated in" without providing a clear reference to where the validation occurred. This weakens the claim and makes it difficult for the audience to assess the reliability of the information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as validated in" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a statement by indicating that it has been confirmed or proven through a specific source or process. Ludwig shows that is typically used to lend credibility to a claim by referencing supporting evidence.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

93%

Formal & Business

4%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "as validated in" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase, particularly in scientific and formal writing, to assert that a statement has been confirmed by a verifiable source. According to Ludwig, it's crucial to explicitly mention the source of validation to bolster credibility. Common usage includes academic, scientific, and formal contexts, while it is rare in informal settings. Using alternatives like "as confirmed by" or "as supported by" can offer stylistic variation. It's important to avoid using the phrase without providing the specific validation source to ensure clarity and trust.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as confirmed by

Replaces "validated" with "confirmed", focusing on the act of verifying correctness or truth.

as supported by

Emphasizes the idea that something is backed or upheld by evidence or data.

as demonstrated in

Highlights that something has been shown or proven through a specific example or experiment.

as verified by

Focuses on the process of checking or testing something to ensure it is accurate or true.

as substantiated by

Implies that something is supported by strong evidence or proof.

as attested by

Suggests that something is affirmed to be true or genuine, often by a witness or authority.

as proven in

Highlights that something has been definitively established as true through rigorous testing or analysis.

according to validation by

Indicates that a statement or finding aligns with validation processes conducted by a certain authority.

in accordance with validation from

Indicates that a statement or finding complies with validation processes from a specific source.

per validation studies

Specifies the information is derived directly from validation studies.

FAQs

How can I use "as validated in" in a sentence?

Use "as validated in" to indicate that a statement or method has been confirmed or proven through a specific study, experiment, or source. For example, "The treatment's effectiveness was significant, as validated in a recent clinical trial."

What are some alternatives to using "as validated in"?

Alternatives to "as validated in" include phrases like "as confirmed by", "as supported by", or "as demonstrated in", depending on the specific context.

Is it necessary to provide a source when using "as validated in"?

Yes, it is crucial to provide a specific source or reference when using "as validated in". This ensures transparency and allows readers to verify the claim being made. Omitting the source weakens the statement's credibility.

What's the difference between "as validated in" and "as shown by"?

"As validated in" specifically implies that something has undergone a formal validation process or study, whereas "as shown by" is a more general phrase indicating that something has been demonstrated or revealed, but not necessarily formally validated.