The phrase "as understood in terms" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining a concept or idea by clarifying how it is perceived or interpreted within a specific context or framework.
Example: "The theory is complex, but it can be simplified as understood in terms of basic principles of physics."
Alternatives: "as interpreted in relation to" or "as perceived in the context of".
The topics of Stories 1, 4, and 5 (i.e. recall of medicine, stem cells, and college shootings) appear to be of both general and recent interest, as well as easily understood in terms of national importance or implications (e.g. regarding safety, ethics, and politics); such topics seem to be commonly assigned to staff writers.
Vives was pessimistic about the possibility of attaining knowledge as understood in Aristotelian terms; and his thought anticipates the moderate skepticism of early modern philosophers such as Francisco Sanches (1551 1623) and Pierre Gassendi (1592 1655).
That is not to say that Indian Catholicism, for example, did not have its own tensions and divisions -- it did and does, but those tensions and divisions do not track very well with "conservative" and "liberal" as understood in American terms and by referencing the idiosyncrasies of the American political scene.
However, criticism of the extreme antics of the small minority of Christian conservatives in Korea has been taken as prima facie additional evidence of the perceived social persecution of Christians and Christianity in general, and lately as similar evidence of the dissolution and degradation of society, especially as that is understood in terms of the loss of traditional Korean ways and mores.
Various theories have been proposed in answer to these questions, the most popular being that the forms of art are similar to language and are to be understood as language is understood, in terms of conventions and semantic rules.
From the metaphor of the creative city (Laundry 2008) to the city as Interwoven cities, understood in terms of fabrics, cloths, threads, and elaborate in a scheme with 'seams, cuts and point of friction' (Magee 2016; cf. Skivko 2013).
Although it may be easier to "correct" a lack of education or job training than a physical or psychiatric disability (but not always), the latter as well as the former can be understood in terms of a poor fit between the resources of the individual and the demands of the social environment.
The interface structure as well as the orientation relations can be understood in terms of lowest-energy considerations based on a near-coincidence site lattice model.
Thus, Christian Schemmel (2011) argues that the treatment of people as equals must be understood in terms of respectful relationships among individuals and institutions, and that the presence of such relationships cannot plausibly be regarded in what Pogge (2004a, 2004b) calls "recipient-oriented" terms, as components of individual well-being.
