The phrase "as two nature" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "as two natures"? If this is the case, you can use it in contexts discussing dual aspects or characteristics of something, often in theological or philosophical discussions.
Example: "The doctrine states that Christ exists as two natures, divine and human, in one person."
Alternatives: "in two natures" or "as dual nature".
Otherwise, as one Nature Conservancy economist told me, "it implicitly gets a value of zero".
Written between 1215 and 1220, the Summa aurea, in four books, selectively treated such theological matters as God as one nature in three persons, creation, man, Christ and the virtues, sacramental worship, and the Last Judgment.
If one counts the whole heaven composed out of the best of the elements as one nature and adds to it the four sublunary elements, we may speak of five natures altogether.
Dr. Günel led the largest international genome wide association studies of intracranial aneurysms, identifying several susceptibility loci, as published in two Nature Genetics papers.
The concepts of duality or polarity find expression as the body and soul of man, the divine pair, the syzygy (paired emanations) in gnosticism, the dualism of God and the Devil, of good and evil, and, finally, as the two natures of Christ.
Just as the two natures are of a same entity, ultimate truth and conventional truth are of same ontological status.
In this study, three old and successful methods consist of Variable Neighborhood Search VNSS), Tabu Search TSS) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), as well as two recent nature-inspired algorithms; Keshtel Algorithm (KA) and Water Wave Optimization (WWO) are utilized.
In conclusion Gelug's theory of the two truths is based on one fundamental thesis that each conventionally real phenomenon satisfies the definitions of both truths for each phenomenon, as it sees it, possesses two natures that serve as the basis of the definitions of the two truths.
As each phenomenon possesses two natures, so each verifying cognitive process has a different nature as its referent, even though there is only one ontological entity and one cognitive agent involved.
If a sprout, for example, actually did possess two natures as proposed in Gelug's theory of the two truths, then, according to Sakya, each nature would have to be ontologically distinct.
