The phrase "as too onerous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is excessively burdensome or difficult to manage.
Example: "The new regulations were seen as too onerous for small businesses to comply with."
Alternatives: "as overly burdensome" or "as excessively demanding".
Other efforts, in 1997 and 2002, were abandoned after the airlines rejected as too onerous a requirement that they give up as many as 16 daily takeoff and landing slots at Heathrow.
Two previous efforts, in 1997 and 2002, were abandoned after the airlines rejected as too onerous a requirement that they give up as many as 16 daily takeoff and landing slots at Heathrow.
The two previous efforts, in 1997 and 2002, were abandoned after the airlines rejected as too onerous a requirement that they give up as many as 16 daily takeoff and landing slots from Heathrow.
conditions were seen as too onerous.
President Bill Clinton vetoed a similar bill last year, describing it as too onerous on debtors.
But even those rules were widely criticized as too onerous for many in Washington.
The derivatives legislation was criticized by consumer groups as being too weak and by Wall Street interests as being too onerous.
Some companies have cited the auditing process as being too onerous, according to Global Network Initiative participants who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to discourage companies from joining in the future.
During a week of debate, Republican critics led by Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina attacked the legislation as being too onerous on businesses, saying it would "create a playground for plaintiffs' attorneys".
The sweeping No Child Left Behind Act, a Texas-grown product of the George W. Bush presidency, was roundly criticized as being too onerous and unrealistic in its expectations for student achievement: One hundred percent of students were supposed to perform at "proficient" levels on standardized tests by 2014.
SFA chief executive Stewart Regan explained: "As far as the specific wording and the resolution is concerned, the clubs felt that it was drafted in such a way as to be too onerous; to move to strict liability from where we are now was quite a leap.
