The phrase "as the writ" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts, often referring to a document or order issued by a court.
Example: "The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff, as the writ clearly stated the terms of the agreement."
Alternatives: "as the order" or "as the document".
Petitioner has no traditional remedy, such as the writ of habeas corpus upon which Accardi relied, by which to redress the loss of its rights.
As the writ of habeas corpus does not perform the office of a writ of error or an appeal, these facts cannot be re-examined or reviewed in this collateral proceeding.
What seems ever more apparent in the attack in Riyadh that left at least 17 people dead and 122 wounded is that it is no longer Americans or even Westerners who are the targets of terrorism in Saudi Arabia, but rather stability itself in the oil-producing kingdom, as well as the writ of the House of Saud.
In reaction to this, the Court of King's Bench developed its own, faster system, intent on winning cases back, and through procedures such as the Writ of Quominus and Bill of Middlesex acquired a wider jurisdiction.
As the writ only exists in a copy in a later cartulary, and the Abbey of Westminster is also known to have forged a number of other writs or charters, the writ is not a solid source for royal rolls being kept as early as 1110.
- You will have to serve your spouse all the above filed forms as well as the Writ of Summons (Need to have this form completed and signed by your spouse and given back to you).
Most vocal among them was Senator Elizabeth Warren who said, "What is this fact equivalency nonsense for parallel universes or alternative matter?! What would then stop this administration from claiming a terrorist attack on US soil supports drastic measures such as suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus?
We moved the writ as soon as we could and are carrying out a full postal primary which gives every single resident in Rochester and Strood a say on our candidate.
The Court therefore should not have granted the petition in the first place, or it should have dismissed the writ as improvidently granted as soon as oral argument made manifestly clear the insufficiency of the record.
The court dismissed the original indictment and conviction against Yasui, as well as the petition for the writ on request by the government.
Such harmonization, along with the Great Writ's importance as the only writ explicitly protected by the Constitution, counsels hesitancy before interpreting AEDPA's silence on equitable tolling as congressional intent to close courthouse doors that a strong equitable claim would keep open.
