The phrase "as subcontract" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to a role or function related to subcontracting, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure.
Example: "The company will engage a third party as a subcontractor to handle the additional workload."
Alternatives: "as a subcontractor" or "in a subcontracting role".
In the era of mass manufacture, small firms typically played supporting roles, such as subcontracting to large firms.
An alternative approach is for the domestic researcher--you--to include foreign research expenses--yes, NIH will pay even core research costs for your foreign colleague--as a subcontract.
The direct costs to which the F&A cost rate is applied are referred to collectively as the "facilities and administrative cost base" or "collection base". The collection base required by OMB Circular A-21 is modified total direct costs (MTDC), i.e., all direct costs less certain exclusions such as equipment, subcontract costs exceeding $25,000, fellowship stipends and tuition, etc.
For administrative purposes, Columbia University should be listed as the sponsor: as with any subcontract submission, the primary site (Columbia University) is your sponsor, not NIH.
At one time he earned £40,000 a year as an IT engineer, but he was made redundant two years ago and now earns £6.15 an hour working as a subcontracted cleaner for the Government.
And there is growing annoyance at what many see as the subcontracting of British justice to European courts.But the decision to opt in or out of such arrangements is less stark than it seems.
And just as Japan subcontracted its labor-intensive industries to South Korea, Israel could begin by moving its struggling diamond cutting and clothing manufacturing increasingly irrelevant to Israel's high-tech economy to the independent Palestine.
As a subcontracted employee, a yoga teacher should maintain health and accident insurance.
Two of those friends are influential Republicans in their own right and commissioners on state authorities, and one of those two, Anthony J. Sartor, was later the beneficiary of a $3 million state subcontract as part of the troubled overhaul of New Jersey's automobile emissions inspection system.
