The phrase "as sameness" is not commonly used in written English and may be unclear in meaning.
It could be used in contexts discussing identity, uniformity, or similarity, but it would require additional context for clarity.
Example: "In the discussion of cultural identity, the concept of as sameness can lead to misunderstandings about individual differences."
Alternatives: "as uniformity" or "as similarity".
Phonological, or phonemic, identity was referred to above as "sameness of sound from the linguistic point of view".
Once it has been decided what counts as "sameness" of sound from the linguistic point of view, the permissible range of variation for particular sounds in particular contexts can be measured, and, within certain limits, the acoustic cues for the identification of utterances as "the same" can be determined.
Aquinas holds that the three are not merely similar or derived from the same source, but are in some strong sense the same, but not identical (i.e. numerically the same) which he appears to understand as sameness in both thing and concept.
It rests on viewing mental representations or intelligible species, as Aquinas calls them, as sameness in form.
These results are discussed in the light of both current models of the self and philosophical concepts such as sameness and selfhood.
Rather than ignoring what distinguishes one person from another, it is argued, respect should involve attending to each person as a distinctive individual and to the concrete realities of human lives, and it should involve valuing difference as well as sameness and interdependence as well as independence.
After delivering their "report", the word was gobbled up by the world's media who duly turned it from a concept into a trend, particularly once New York magazine's fashion blog, The Cut, applied it to fashion, defining normcore as "embracing sameness deliberately as a new way of being cool".
For some, Spurrier's presence will be the equivalent of opening a window on a musty league that can be as brutal in its dullness and sameness as in its violence.
The next essay, by psychotherapist Laurie Lassiter (Ch.7), strives to extend psychodynamic models to micro-organisms, on seriously questionable epistemological bases as we shall see in 'Unification as statement of sameness'.
This thought has been with me for a while as the relentless cycle of reform/transform continues to beat its drum as it reproduces sameness with little change (Hurd 1997).
Conservative pundits here like to speak of this equality and sameness as being cornerstones of "Japanese" tradition.
