The phrase "as rulemaking" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to a process or action related to creating rules or regulations, but it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "The agency is focused on improving its procedures as rulemaking becomes more complex."
Alternatives: "in terms of rulemaking" or "regarding rulemaking".
For the president — who recognizes that global warming ranks as a low priority among voters — the issue has become as much about evangelizing as rulemaking.
After Pruitt intervened, Buerkle announced last August that the commission would explore the voluntary standards being developed by the industry trade association even as rulemaking on the other front technically continued.
On the other hand, Congress and others tend to object to what they view as rulemaking through interpretation by an independent agency, so the approach in the CHOICE Act may reappear in new legislation.
Just as, centuries ago, stock exchanges did for conventional finance, SSEs today serve as rulemaking laboratories for social finance.
In the article's concluding section, the authors discuss other mechanisms, such as rulemaking or formal adjudication, which could address the fair notice doctrine considerations.
As rulemaking continues for the EPA's reassessment of current PCB regulations, an EPA spokeswoman provided no information on the status of the agency's ongoing assessment of non-dioxinlike health effects of PCBs.
In the current round of rulemaking meetings, as well as during such sessions in the last years of the Obama administration, for-profit college representatives have complained to the department that their industry was being portrayed as villainous.
I would work with the staff and my fellow Commissioners to finish, in as timely and smart a way as possible, the rulemaking mandates contained in the Dodd-Frank Act and JOBS Act.
But the whole point of rulemaking as opposed to adjudication (or of statutory law as opposed to case-by-case common law development) is to incur a small possibility of inaccuracy in exchange for a large increase in efficiency and predictability.
Focusing on the central role of the Environmental Protection Agency, they discuss such topics as facility permitting, rulemaking, participatory processes, bias in enforcement, and the role of the courts in redressing environmental injustices.
The court also was not persuaded by EPA's "new interpretation" of Section 321(a) pursuant to which EPA claimed it had complied with its requirements by preparing regulatory impact analyses and economic impact analyses as part of rulemaking processes, even though they were not prepared for the explicit purpose of complying with Section 321(a).
