Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "as revised for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been modified or updated for a specific purpose or audience.
Example: "The document has been submitted as revised for clarity and conciseness."
Alternatives: "as updated for" or "as modified for".
Exact(2)
Two years later, a hybrid five-act version appeared, joining the Fontainebleau act to the Spanish acts as revised for La Scala, but with Carlo's aria back in its original place.
Counting all 24 stems that were lost to follow-up as revised for aseptic loosening (the worst-case scenario), survival was 93% (CI: 88 98) for MSS Co, 79% (CI: 70 87) for SL Co, 79% (CI: 73 85) for MSS Ti, and 57% (CI: 49 65) for SL Ti at 15 years (p < 0.001, log-rank test).
Similar(57)
The first endpoint was defined as "any surgery on the operated knee" and the second was defined as "prosthesis revised for mechanical failure or infection".
Additionally, 'Links' has been expanded to include other interesting sites, as well as having been revised for broken hyperlinks and removed content.
Survival rate considering the second endpoint defined as "prosthesis revised for mechanical failure or infection" was also significantly lower (p = 0.002) in the PTA group (94%, CI: 89 99) than in the PA group (100%, CI: 99 100).
Corrected versions of Fig. 1 and Table 2, as well as revised wording for the results and conclusions sections, appear below.
Without sacrificing his mordant wit or bleak worldview, this distinctive dramatist shows a new maturity and empathy in "The Lyons," especially as it's been revised for Broadway.
AS revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
His first play, Farther Off from Heaven (1947), was produced in Dallas, Texas, at the recommendation of Tennessee Williams, to whom Inge had sent the script; 10 years later it was revised for Broadway as The Dark at the Top of the Stairs (filmed 1960).
Inpatients who had their hip replacement revised for infection as opposed to mechanical loosening or pain had less improvement in FIM; they were also discharged home from rehabilitation setting less often when compared to inpatients with first hip replacement [ 12].
The proportion of revisions with a diagnosis of infection differed between these groups, with 5.1% of primary UKAs being revised for infection as compared to 23% of primary TKAs.
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com