as reviewed in the introduction

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as reviewed in the introduction" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer back to information or points that were discussed earlier in the introduction of a document or paper. Example: "The findings of this study, as reviewed in the introduction, highlight the importance of early intervention."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

While the "emotional blunting" aspect of this model has received physiological support35,36, subjective ratings of arousal and/or valence have shown inconsistent sleep-related modulation of emotional tone18,19,23,24,32,37,38, as reviewed in the introduction.

Nature

As reviewed in the 'Introduction' section, the use of grid models with finite-difference and finite-volume methods for weather and climate models was reconsidered as massively parallel computer architectures entered widespread use.

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

As reviewed in the introduction, the evidence for both positions is mixed.

Plosone

As reviewed in the introduction, previous studies have shown that disparities between a cell's transcriptome and proteome are the norm rather than the exception.

Plosone

As reviewed in the introduction, outside of the present framework of coordination dynamics there have been many extensive studies of human-machine interaction covering a wide variety of contexts.

Plosone

As reviewed in the Introduction, two concurrent studies indicated that trpv4−/− mice had decreased osteoclast populations that coincided with increase in bone densities, although this was only observed in response to chronic unloading in one study [39], [42].

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Proofs of our results, for somewhat stronger hypotheses than ours and in special cases, are scattered in the literature, as briefly reviewed in the 'Introduction' and 'Setting of the problem' sections.

The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience

As briefly reviewed in the Introduction, and more extensively elsewhere [ 4- 6], MYB is essential for the proliferation of multiple cancer and normal cell types, including haemopoietic, colonic and mammary epithelial.

Breast Cancer Research

As we reviewed in the Introduction, the current models for receiving feedback in higher education—end-of-course student ratings and peer reviews are intended to assess competence using a standardized instrument, are prescribed rather than voluntary, and are not perceived as coming from credible sources.

CBE Life Sciences Education

Most importantly, the event-driven method does not attempt to present a predictive evolutionary model such as the models reviewed in the introduction.

Bioinformatics

As demonstrated by other studies – reviewed in the Introduction – which investigated the link between vowel lenition and coarticulation, changes in the spectral or temporal properties of consonants caused by adjacent vowels undergoing lenition indicate that the vowel is not deleted but, rather, is still present in the acoustic record and, therefore, in the articulatory event.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "as reviewed in the introduction" to smoothly transition into a discussion of specific details or findings already presented, creating a cohesive flow for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "as reviewed in the introduction" excessively within short sections. If the introduction is immediately preceding, consider a simpler reference like "as mentioned above" or omit the phrase entirely for conciseness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as reviewed in the introduction" serves as a transitional phrase, directing the reader's attention back to information that has already been covered earlier in the document. It's often used to provide context or to build upon previously established points. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which identifies the phrase as grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

Science & Research

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as reviewed in the introduction" is a grammatically correct and commonly used transitional phrase, particularly within formal and scientific writing. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and the search results indicate its frequent appearance in scientific journals and research publications. The phrase functions to remind the reader of information already presented, providing context and establishing a foundation for subsequent discussion. While effective, writers should avoid overuse and consider simpler alternatives in contexts where the introduction is immediately preceding. Alternatives include "as mentioned in the introduction" or "as discussed in the introduction".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as previously stated in the introduction

Focuses on the act of stating information earlier.

as mentioned in the introduction

Emphasizes a brief reference to the information.

as detailed in the introduction

Highlights the comprehensive nature of the earlier explanation.

as outlined in the introduction

Suggests a structured presentation of information.

as discussed earlier in the introduction

Highlights the conversational or analytical aspect of the prior presentation.

according to the introduction

Presents information as originating from the introduction.

in the introduction, it was reviewed that

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the location of the review.

the introduction reviewed

Shortens the phrase, making it more concise.

the review in the introduction indicated that

Highlights the indication or suggestion made by the review.

per the introduction's review

Uses a more formal tone.

FAQs

How to use "as reviewed in the introduction" in a sentence?

You can use "as reviewed in the introduction" to refer back to a topic or information that has already been discussed. For instance, "As reviewed in the introduction, this study aims to explore the impact of social media on teenage behavior."

What can I say instead of "as reviewed in the introduction"?

You can use alternatives like "as mentioned in the introduction", "as discussed in the introduction", or "as stated in the introduction" depending on the context.

Is it necessary to specify "in the introduction" if the review is implied?

Specifying "in the introduction" provides clarity, especially in longer documents. While sometimes implied, explicitly stating the section prevents ambiguity and enhances reader comprehension.

What is the difference between "as reviewed in the introduction" and "as summarized in the introduction"?

"As reviewed in the introduction" suggests a more detailed overview or analysis was provided, whereas "as summarized in the introduction" indicates a condensed version of information was previously presented.