Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Hence, bilateral trade with the countries characterized by the lowest level of bilateral trade costs was crucial, which reflected in both imports and exports as reported in Appendix 3: Table 9.
As reported in Appendix D, a sensitivity analysis showed that the number of loci and alleles did not significantly affect model results for FST, FSC, and FCT.
Importantly, these results were substantiated by parametric testing as reported in Appendix B. We hypothesized that there might be specific differences in the performance of neglect patients when comparing between- and within-decade items.
Similar(57)
17We also do not report sensitivity analyses that feature only linear effects and different specifications of the set of dummies, as they deliver the same message as the one reported in Appendix B: Table 4.
For studies of common cold or undefined/non-specific respiratory tract infections, we extracted data on symptom duration for the cluster of symptoms comprising a cold as defined in each study (reported in appendix 2).
During the display of each training sequence, the operator explained the meaning of each label, as summarized in the written instructions reported in Appendix A. The entire set of test sessions was performed in each laboratory.
(60), (61), (62) reported in Appendix A. As for the membrane potential, it is necessary to introduce the formal expansion u ˜ j = ∑ h = 0 4 u ˜ j ( h ) N h + O ( 1 N 5 ).
For sake of brevity, the analytical assessment of PU12_DC is reported in Appendix B. Again, as in (7), two different components, one DC (PU1+2_DC) and the other AC (PU1+2_AC), are defined.
All primers (excluding those tested as described below, a total of 433 pairs) are reported in Appendix S2.
The cells used as MP underwent a number of controls before infusion and showed the features reported in Appendix Table S1.
As can be seen from Table 2 and the direct (head-to-head) evaluations reported in Appendix 1 (Tables 7 and 8), the studies provide consistent results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com