as related reference

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as related reference" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a reference that is related to a specific topic or context, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The findings of this study should be considered as related reference for future research in the field."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

This concern pervades his studies of social theory; and it is possible to interpret his emphasis on the 'conservative' origins of sociology and his attack on leveling public administration from the 1950s onward as related reference points.

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences

Literature on the normal MRI anatomy of the rabbit brain and associated structures as well as related reference values is sparse.

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

For -Bloch and other Bloch-type spaces, see, for example, [1 9], as well as the related references therein.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

The linear part of system (26) generates an exponentially stable C 0 -semigroup in a suitable Banach space; see [43] as well as the related references therein.

Boundary Value Problems

Robots can also converge in Euclidean space; see [28] for a recent treatment of a basic multi-dimensional robot convergence task tolerating Byzantine faults, including a discussion of applications to robots, distributed voting and optimization problems, as well as further related references.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

We used a custom pipeline that leveraged remapping protocols using the aligner BWA [ 13] against the closely related reference sequence USA300-FPR3757 as well as de novo assembly with Abyss [ 14] to successfully call polymorphisms ranging from single nucleotide variants (SNV) to large structural rearrangements.

BMC Genomics

These strains were used for further detailed comparative genomic analysis along with Pseudomonas sp. TKP which was included for inhabiting similar HCH stress (as strain RL) although an outlier from related reference genotypes as per the phylogenetic tree.

BMC Genomics

We used the GIPSy software to identify putative PAIs in W. ceti, using the genome sequence of W. koreensis KACC 15510 as the nonpathogenic, closely related reference species [ 30].

BMC Genomics

For species with large EST collections but scant genome sequence data, including wheat and barley, aligning their ESTs to a closely related reference genome, such as Os, should shed light on alternative splicing in these species.

BMC Plant Biology

Input to treecat are the FASTA [ 21] sequences of the contigs and of the related references as well as a phylogenetic tree in Newick format.

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

The additionally included ORFs and their related references as well as detailed comparisons of reactions in lipid metabolism of all reported models are given in Additional files 1 and 2, respectively.

BMC Systems Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to connect a reference to a specific subject, use clearer and more direct language such as "relevant reference" or "related citation" instead of "as related reference".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "as related reference" in formal writing; it sounds unnatural. Opt for more common and grammatically sound alternatives like "relevant reference" or "related source".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as related reference" functions as a modifier, attempting to describe a type of reference. However, Ludwig AI highlights that it is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity, making it unsuitable for formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

Wiki

20%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as related reference" is not recommended for formal writing. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect and lacking clarity, favoring clearer alternatives such as "relevant reference" or "associated reference". While the intention is to connect a reference to a specific subject, the awkward phrasing diminishes its effectiveness. Stick to established and grammatically sound phrases for precision and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

relevant reference

Emphasizes the pertinence and importance of the reference to the topic at hand.

associated reference

Highlights a connection or link between the reference and the subject.

pertinent reference

Similar to 'relevant reference', stressing the direct applicability of the reference.

connected reference

Focuses on the link or relationship the reference has to the topic.

linked reference

Implies a direct connection, often through citation or shared content.

allied reference

Suggests a similarity or alignment in content or purpose.

corresponding reference

Indicates a parallel or matching reference to the subject.

cognate reference

Implies a shared origin or relatedness in the information provided.

parallel reference

Suggests a similar reference that runs alongside the current topic.

analogous reference

Highlights similarities in function or content between the reference and the subject.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "as related reference"?

You can use alternatives like "relevant reference", "related source", or "pertinent reference" depending on the context.

How to use "as related reference" in a sentence?

While grammatically questionable, you might see it used (though rarely and ideally avoided) in constructions like "The findings of this study can be used as related reference for future research", although rewording for clarity is recommended.

Is "as related reference" grammatically correct?

No, "as related reference" is not considered grammatically sound. It's better to use clearer phrases like "relevant reference" or "associated reference".

What's the difference between "as related reference" and "relevant reference"?

"As related reference" is an awkward and uncommon phrasing. "Relevant reference" is a grammatically correct and widely accepted way to describe a reference that is applicable and important to a particular topic.