Our results join other recent studies and highlight the need for a re-evaluation of pinniped taxonomy, especially as regards the subfamilial classification of otariids and the generic nomenclature of Phocina.
The classification of the voxels according to the differences in uptake at PET1 and PET2 and their position as regards the CT tumour volume were visually checked.
Our analyses showed a moderate overall concordance of both, with a high agreement regarding the classification as non-MDS, but with moderate agreement in their classification as MDS.
Regarding the classification as either 'strong recommendation' or 'recommendation', we decided not to use a strict rule (eg, ≥3 saying yes results in strong recommendation, <2 saying yes results in recommendation), but rather apply the following rule of thumb: if a recommendation was rated for each or most of the criteria as 'yes', the recommendation was rated as a 'strong recommendation'.
One possible explanation for these disparate findings regarding the classification of Dichaete as a group B1 or B2 protein may be provided by the role of Dichaete in the regulation of proneural genes and its early activity on pros.
Current opinions are mixed regarding the classification of the form as a chronospecies or a separate species Gymnogyps amplus.
Consequently, we regarded the classification of headache, especially TTH, as an essential and key element in the assessment of studies.
ROC analysis was performed for the analysis of performance regarding the classification of the MPS studies as normal vs. abnormal (infarction and/or ischemia).
As regards the TRANSFAC classification [ 24] a number of factors belonging to two super-classes: zinc-coordinating DNA-binding domains [ 21] and ApiAP2 proteins [ 25] have been in silico annotated in the parasite.
Typology in this sense is regarded as the "classification of models" (Salama 2006).
