Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as prior thought
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as prior thought" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to refer to previous ideas or considerations, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "As prior thought suggested, we should reconsider our approach to the project."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
No one should go to Reservoir Dogs without prior thought.
News & Media
Later, when Moses had been asked to serve as their intermediary with God, they believed that he was addressed by speech that had its origin in God, but without prior thought on his part.
Science
A thought [Gedanke] may exhibit immediate certainty, obvious without any mediating thought-acts; or a thought may be mediately certain, grounded in prior thought-acts.
Science
People believe things which support their prior thoughts without questioning them.
Earth Won't Die as Soon as Thought.
Science & Research
These primers are not as specific as thought previously.
Science
Find out about the prior events, thoughts and feelings that drove the acting-out behaviors.
News & Media
Startups value me as a thought partner.
News & Media
As you repeat the thought, make sure that you label it as a thought.
Wiki
Is conceptual thought prior to language?
A well-judged pause for thought prior to the final reckoning.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Instead of using "as prior thought", opt for clearer and more common phrases such as "as previously thought" or "based on earlier considerations" to enhance readability and understanding.
Common error
Avoid using "as prior thought" in formal contexts. It's often perceived as awkward and can detract from your writing's credibility. Use more conventional alternatives like "as previously mentioned" or "in light of earlier analysis".
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as prior thought" functions as an introductory element attempting to refer to previous ideas or considerations. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it's not a standard or grammatically sound construction, making it less effective in conveying its intended meaning.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "as prior thought" is not a standard or grammatically correct expression in English. As Ludwig AI points out, it's better to opt for clearer and more commonly used alternatives like "as previously thought" or "based on earlier considerations". These alternatives enhance clarity and ensure that your writing is both idiomatic and effective. Avoiding "as prior thought" will improve your writing's credibility and readability, particularly in formal or academic settings. While the intended purpose is to reference earlier ideas, the non-standard nature of the phrase undermines its effectiveness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
as previously thought
Replaces "prior" with "previously" for improved clarity and common usage.
as earlier considered
Substitutes "prior thought" with "earlier considered", emphasizing the act of considering something beforehand.
based on previous considerations
Rephrases the idea to highlight that something is based on earlier considerations.
in light of prior analysis
Changes the structure to emphasize that a prior analysis informs the current perspective.
given prior thought
Uses "given" to indicate that something is happening because of previous thinking.
considering earlier ideas
Focuses on the process of considering ideas that came before.
with prior reflection
Highlights the element of reflection that occurred before the present moment.
taking into account previous thoughts
Emphasizes the act of taking into account thoughts from an earlier time.
pursuant to prior thinking
Uses a more formal tone to indicate that actions follow prior thinking.
as initially conceived
Shifts the focus to the initial conception or idea, rather than general thought.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "as prior thought" that are more grammatically sound?
Consider using alternatives such as "as previously thought", "based on earlier considerations", or "as earlier considered" for clearer and more effective communication.
Is "as prior thought" considered correct in academic writing?
No, "as prior thought" is not considered standard or correct in academic writing. It's better to use more precise and commonly accepted phrases to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.
How can I rephrase a sentence using "as prior thought" to make it more idiomatic?
Instead of saying "As prior thought indicated, we should change our strategy", try "As previously thought, we should change our strategy" or "Based on earlier considerations, we should change our strategy".
What's wrong with using the phrase "as prior thought"?
The phrase "as prior thought" is not a standard or idiomatic expression in English. It's less clear and less frequently used than alternatives, which can make your writing sound awkward. Using a phrase like "as previously thought" improves clarity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested