Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as per erosion
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as per erosion" is not commonly used in written English and may not be clear in its meaning.
It could be used in contexts discussing geological processes or environmental changes related to erosion, but it may require additional context for clarity. Example: "The landscape has changed significantly as per erosion over the past decade."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
The final score of entire nine sub-watersheds is assigned as per erosion threat.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
They were as old as erosions in a fishless desert".
News & Media
A. There has not been as much margin erosion as some had feared.
News & Media
This HVOF coated sample was tested for dry sand abrasion and slurry erosion as per ASTM standards.
Their dissolution is viewed within the labor movement as further erosion of the unions' sway.
News & Media
This category includes processes such as sheet erosion, rill, gully erosion, and ravines.
Science
Processes responsible for this remobilization are mainly water erosion starting as sheet erosion and propagating to rill and gully forming erosion.
Science
They equate their loss of cultural dominance as an erosion of their religious freedom.
News & Media
But as the erosion of marriage spread across racial lines, so did his warnings.
News & Media
All pubic symphyses had some non-specific signs reported as: 'pubic erosion, symphyseal irregularity, anteroinferior corner erosion' (figure 2).
At many sites of focal bone erosion (as in Fig. 1), TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were seen at the erosion front and in the synovium (Fig. 3e,3f), as well as in erosion pits in the bone (Fig. 3h).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
In technical or scientific writing, specify the standards or methods used for measuring erosion rather than relying on the ambiguous phrase "as per erosion".
Common error
Refrain from using "as per erosion" without proper context, as it can lead to confusion. Ensure that the relationship between the subject and erosion is explicitly stated for clarity.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as per erosion" functions as an adverbial phrase, aiming to specify a condition or standard related to erosion. However, based on Ludwig AI, the usage is infrequent and can lack clarity. This contrasts with more common adverbial phrases like "according to" or "based on".
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "as per erosion" is an infrequent and potentially ambiguous expression. Ludwig AI analysis suggests that while it occasionally appears in scientific and technical contexts, it lacks the clarity and common usage found in alternative phrases like "according to erosion" or "based on erosion". For enhanced clarity and comprehension, it's recommended to opt for these more explicit alternatives in both formal and informal writing. Although the phrase isn't strictly grammatically wrong, its infrequent use and possible ambiguity warrants choosing more common and precise language.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
according to erosion
Replaces "as per" with "according to", offering a more standard grammatical structure.
based on erosion
Uses "based on" instead of "as per", focusing on erosion as the foundation or criterion.
in relation to erosion
This option highlights the connection or relationship concerning erosion.
with respect to erosion
Provides a formal way of indicating the aspect or viewpoint of erosion.
regarding erosion
Offers a general way to indicate the topic of erosion.
concerning erosion
Similar to "regarding", but might imply a more direct relevance to erosion.
as a result of erosion
Focuses on the consequences or outcomes caused by erosion.
due to erosion
States a direct causal relationship where erosion is the cause.
following erosion standards
Specifies adherence to established guidelines or norms related to erosion.
in accordance with erosion data
Suggests alignment or compliance with empirical information about erosion.
FAQs
How can I describe something that follows guidelines related to erosion?
Consider using phrases such as "in accordance with erosion standards" or "following erosion control guidelines" for clearer communication.
What are some alternatives to using "as per" in the context of erosion?
You could use phrases like "according to erosion data", "based on erosion measurements", or "due to erosion processes" depending on the context.
Is "as per erosion" grammatically correct in formal writing?
While not strictly incorrect, "as per erosion" can be ambiguous. Opt for more precise alternatives like "according to erosion" or "in accordance with erosion" for better clarity.
How does using "as per erosion" affect the clarity of a sentence?
It can reduce clarity because the phrase is not commonly used and might not be immediately understood. Using clearer alternatives ensures the message is easily comprehensible.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested