Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "as peer examination" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to a process involving peer review or assessment, but the phrasing is unclear.
Example: "The results were evaluated as part of a peer examination process to ensure accuracy and reliability."
Alternatives: "as peer review" or "as peer assessment".
Exact(2)
SimMan was as effective as peer examination in increasing the students' confidence.
In addition, the manikin was as effective as peer examination in increasing students' confidence.
Similar(58)
The aim of the study was to explore the role of SimMan® as an adjunct to peer examination in the teaching of clinical skills to preclinical medical students.
Thus, an integrated learning approach using SimMan® as an adjunct to peer examination can benefit preclinical medical students' ability to acquire clinical skills.
Thus the manikin, when used as an adjunct to peer examination, can help students' improve their ability to perform chest examination.> -wrap-foot> Group A (Group using peer examination initially); Group B (Group using SimMan® initially).
Integrated learning by using SimMan as an adjunct to peer examination can be exciting and motivating in ways that might benefit learning by bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical years.
The use of simulation in this context supports an integrated learning approach when used as an adjunct to peer examination, and can benefit the acquisition of clinical skills in preclinical medical students.
This may explain why students scored higher during peer examination when compared to examining the manikin.
Group A students used peer examination initially whilst Group B students initially examined the manikin.
The finding that Group B scored better on peer examination could be explained by the fact that they had more training (SimMan® and Peer examination) than Group A which had been exposed only to peer examination.
Trustworthiness in this study was achieved by conducting a peer examination and debriefing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com