The phrase "as peer assessment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a method of evaluation where individuals assess each other's work or performance, typically in an educational or professional context.
Example: "The students will receive feedback on their projects as peer assessment, allowing them to learn from one another."
Alternatives: "in the form of peer evaluation" or "as a method of peer review".
Two of these articles reported on peer feedback alone [ 33, 34] and although these are categorized as peer assessment, students were not assessing their peers, but providing feedback only to their peers during assessment activities.
Exam scores correlate with other measures of clinical performance, as well as peer assessment.
Complementary methods and instruments, such as peer assessment or observational approaches, would be valuable contributions to the study of variation in student empathy.
Some grants from the Australia Council are based on assessments by panels of artists, arts workers and industry experts known as peer assessments; the council describes itself as operating on an "arm's-length" principle, meaning the government can provide policy directions but can't instruct individual funding decisions.
In addition, it investigated possible friendship bias in peer assessment as well as the impacts of this practice on learners' attitudes towards it.
The results indicated that the practice "inspire a shared vision" was the best evaluated, and the practice "encourage the heart" was the least evaluated, both in the self‐assessment of the manager, as in the peer assessment of employees.
Such checklists have been used as aids in peer assessment of competence [ 28].
Peer assessment performed by peers following a student presentation made as part of a course.
For example, what is the state of novel (and sometimes controversial) features such as auto-grading and peer assessment?
However, it is not always easy for instructors to manage peer assessment, as the number of reviews created by the students can be enormous.
In addition to this modelling of good writing, the quality of other classes' work is being informed by such peer assessment as "good understanding of information, events and ideas from the text", and "this is me interpreting and inferring the idea Lear is not mad". – now on prominent display in our exhibition.
