The phrase "as originally estimated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an initial assessment or calculation that was made before any changes or adjustments were applied.
Example: "The project's budget was adjusted to reflect the costs as originally estimated, ensuring that we stay within our financial limits."
Alternatives: "as initially projected" or "as first calculated".
The cost to replace it is now about $1.2 billion — not $930 million $830 millionn and financing) as originally estimated.
Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Securities in New York, said: "The economy was not as strong in the third quarter as originally estimated.
Output per hour in businesses, excluding farms, rose at an annual rate of 0.2%, rather than remaining flat as originally estimated.
In line with this, the anticipated economic cost of the outbreak has also been revised: the World Bank said this week that the overall effect on Africa would not be as drastic as originally estimated.
Headline inflation in February is expected to be 2.3%, according to provisional estimates.America's economy grew at an annual rate of 1.6% in the last quarter of 2005, not 1.1% as originally estimated.
The expanded program would cost the state roughly $16 billion over 10 years, not $26 billion as originally estimated, Thomas M. Suehs, the Texas health and human services commissioner, told a state House Appropriations Subcommittee on Thursday.
Old refrigerators, cars and fire extinguishers are preventing the ozone hole over the Antarctic from closing as quickly as scientists originally estimated.
A new rescue plan for the world's largest laser project would boost its ultimate cost to almost twice as much as planners originally estimated.
A leaked report from the Department of Homeland Security puts the cost of building the wall (and fencing) at around three times as much as Trump originally estimated, $21 billion in total, and estimates that construction will take at least three years to complete.
Also, as many as 143,000 gallons of crude may have been spilled when the line ruptured, not 101,000 gallons, as Plains originally estimated.
The state rejected the 2006 expansion plan, which they said would have cost $3 billion, not the $1.8 billion originally estimated, as well as a larger $5 billion proposal.
