The phrase "as only published" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something that has been published in a specific manner, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The findings were presented as only published in the journal, without further elaboration."
Alternatives: "as solely published" or "as exclusively published".
They sum up their manifesto as: "Only publish stuff that's so exceptionally exciting it makes us want to set ourselves on fire and jump out of a window; be ballsy; never stray too far from the slush pile".
We don't want to publish in journals that are seen as being dodgy, or as only publishing boring and irrelevant science, so journal editors try to publish what they perceive to be good papers, whilst rejecting those that are not so good.
Along with the Encyclopaedia and the Philosophy of Right might be added similar teaching-related writings from the Jena period, prepared as lectures but only published as such much later.
The assumption is that it was recovered in the 19th century, although where and when cannot be ascertained, nor is it clear why it was only published as late as 1972.
It felt as important as Anne Frank's diary, only published nearly a hundred years before.
Zoella's book, published by Penguin, has also become the fastest selling hardback of 2014 – pretty impressive as it was only published on 25 November.
Yes – though there is only anecdotal evidence for this (the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, which compiles the statistics used by charities such as Mind, is only published every five years, and the next one is not due until 2014).
Studies that met the inclusion criteria mentioned above but were only published as abstracts or as conference presentations were not included in the review unless a full paper could be obtained that related to the abstract.
Cadwallader did not record the events until 1897, and his manuscript was only published, as "Three Years With Grant," in 1955.
