The phrase "as no coverage for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where there is a lack of insurance or protection for something specific.
Example: "The policy was deemed invalid as no coverage for pre-existing conditions was included."
Alternatives: "since there is no protection for" or "as there is no insurance for".
There was no such thing as no coverage for pre-existing conditions, there were no horrible waits, and there was no impersonal service.
Jeanne Finberg, staff attorney with Consumers Union in San Francisco, said it is important that the program's limitations, such as no coverage for hospitalization or maternity services, be adequately explained to the largely Spanish-speaking population that Blue Cross is initially targeting.
The odds of choosing an e-bike were 2.3 and 6.5 times higher if the length of the route has an overall coverage of 50% or 100%, respectively, as compared with no coverage for its total length.
The new law requires substantial "minimum" health care benefits to be provided, which for many insurance plans is more than they currently provide, as well as coverage for "children" up to age 26.
These perks came in the form of lower deductibles and premiums as well as coverage for benefits like vision, hearing and dental services, none of which are covered by traditional Medicare.
After the drug bill's passage, Jacob Hacker and Theodore Marmor of Yale University estimated that a sensible bill could have delivered twice as much coverage for the same price.
For those whose qualify for Medicaid, pregnancy is covered automatically, as is coverage for any children born of Medicaid recipients.
Touch on delicate issues, as well, such as coverage for end-of-life pet care and cremation services.
Ruzigrass has good forage quality, fast growth in the beginning of the rainy season and is readily adaptable to forest-crop-livestock integration systems, not only for animal feeding (green pasture or hay) but also as soil coverage for no-till farming.
Official recognition would bring desperately needed research, they say, as well as more complete coverage for treatment, which can run to more than $10,000 a year.
Of course, the American bishops cannot support the Affordable Care Act as long as it includes coverage for abortion.
