The phrase "as mentioned in the foregoing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer back to something that has been previously stated in the text.
Example: "The results of the study, as mentioned in the foregoing, indicate a significant improvement in patient outcomes."
Alternatives: "as previously stated" or "as noted above".
This standpoint, as mentioned in the foregoing, relies on the discursive mode of reasoning to understand reality, while presupposing an ego-consciousness as the standard referential point.
Yet, it upholds something like a philosophy that springs forth through a reflective restatement of the practice, though this "upholding" must be understood with a proviso that it maintains, as mentioned in the foregoing, a "positionless position".
This opening up simultaneously accompanies, as mentioned in the foregoing, a de-substantialization and de-ontologization of things of experience, because there is no act of the ego that substantializes and ontologizes them; substantialization and ontologization both arise as a consequene of an anthropomorphic activity that is intricately tied to the discursive mode of reasoning.
In other words, for the Zen person both "now" and "here" are experienced as an expression of thing-events in their suchness, because, as mentioned in the foregoing, Zen takes zero time and zero space to be the original abode of thing-events.
(Hence, Zen understands, as was mentioned in the foregoing, the human being to be "a being-in-nature").
Counterfactual attitudes in TSM share some properties with attitudes containing a representational component, but differ from them in other respects, as we have mentioned in the foregoing subsections.
Our contribution is then to perform the selection processes mentioned in the foregoing, by considering them as statistical decision problems and reducing the number of empirical parameters for better robustness.
The ordinance in question here does not grant to the mayor arbitrary power such as is described in the above-mentioned laundry case, but the provision is similar to that mentioned in the foregoing extract from the opinion in that case.
None of the matters mentioned in the foregoing paragraph appear in the pleadings, or elsewhere in the record, and it is therefore doubtful to what extent they may be taken into consideration.
Remark 4 In view of Proposition 1 and its analogy for q.p. sequences mentioned in the foregoing section, a discrete (i.e., restricted to ℤ) analogy of Theorem 2 holds for sequences.
The foregoing features are further elucidated below based on the definitions mentioned in the literature.
