The phrase "as less suitable" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when comparing the suitability of two or more options.
Example: "This option is as less suitable as the previous one."
Alternatives: "less suitable than" or "not as suitable as".
Thus an absence of plants can not be explained by this approach and such sites can not be regarded as less suitable.
A policy capturing design (Study 1) found that managers rated job applicants who had been treated unfairly by their previous employers as less suitable than fairly treated applicants, after objective performance information was controlled.
Areas suitable for species to inhabit are structured i.e., connected or isolated by complex suites of barriers that may be "hard," such as an ocean for a terrestrial organism, or that may be softer, such as less suitable climatic conditions or less attractive vegetation cover.
OpenModel only reached 45% of the possible score and is therefore seen as less suitable for use type I. Table 3 Results of the final quantitative ranking of the preselected software packages Software package Use type I Use type II Rank Total score Rank Total score gmkin 1 86 1 75 KinGUII 2 82 2 73 CAKE 3 79 – – OpenModel 4 45 4 62 mkin – – 3 71.
For most of the 19th century, plant ice was not as clear as much natural ice, sometimes left white residue when it melted and was generally regarded as less suitable for human consumption than the natural product.
Items with Sj < 0.50 are regarded as less suitable [ 33].
The liquid alcohol-based sanitiser was regarded as much less suitable by teachers and children because of its strong smell and the fact that it dripped on the ground.
Applicants who requested an alteration of working hours were rated as significantly less suitable than those who did not [ 73].
Many psychosocial work environment variables are probably related more to individual work styles, preferences and habits as well as to work organisation than to an actual job function, and as such may be less suitable as work-related exposures [ 24, 52].
For habitat specialists, fragmentation has major consequences as it means less suitable habitat for the species to live in.
However, the LIV-MAAS is a rating scale and as such, is less suitable for the analysis of the frequency of the target utterances in this study.
