The phrase "as its sources" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the origins or references of information, ideas, or materials in a context such as research or analysis.
Example: "The report was compiled using various academic journals as its sources to ensure credibility."
Alternatives: "from its references" or "based on its origins".
It quoted unnamed "Western officials with knowledge of the effort" as its sources.
He said that the article complained of did not cite the Lebanese community as its sources, but instead "a family friend" – effectively accusing the Mail of changing its story.
As its sources, the newspaper cited both "an official" said to be helping to formulate the government line, and "other members of the government" who insist the policy turnabout plan is for real.
Among the scenarios that use two sources of information the best was the one using the folksonomy and the personomy as its sources, which was also significantly better than any scenario that used the syntactic approach.
Among the scenarios using the semantic approach, the behavior was similar to the number of tags used, but this time there was no significant difference between the scenario using the folksonomy and personomy as its sources and the one using the three sources, also these scenarios were not better than the syntactic approach using only the folksonomy as its source.
Uber's use of the internal software program was revealed by The Information earlier this year, which reported that between 2014 and the early part of 2016 Uber used a secret software-based effort to track how many Lyft drivers were available for new rides and where they were — citing as its sources a person involved in the program and a person who was briefed about it.
Interfax cited a single security person as its source whom it did not name.
And third, intentionality has a subject, that is, an entity whose intentionality it is, and to whom it can be ascribed as its source or bearer.
It cited the WWF document as its source for that data, but the WWF document included no such numbers.
Knowledge by description, on the other hand, is nonfoundational knowledge of truths; it "always involves…some knowledge of truths as its source and ground" (Russell 1912: 72–3).
