The phrase "as increased when" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a condition or situation where something has increased at a specific time or under certain circumstances, but it lacks clarity.
Example: "The sales figures were reported as increased when the new marketing strategy was implemented."
Alternatives: "as it increased when" or "as it rose when".
Sputum purulence was scored as increased when either the sputum colour changed or sputum thickness increased that day.
The overbite was described as increased when more than two thirds of the lower incisors were covered.
Thrombin generation was considered as increased when at least one of the studied parameters (ETP, Peak or MRI) showed a value higher than the UNL.
We further categorized number of substances used as increased when a person reported a higher number at the second enrollment, compared to the first enrollment; decreased when a person reported a lower number at second enrollment compared to first enrollment, and; no change when the number of substances used stayed the same.
The SOA resulted, however, on a monotonic change in the reference as SOA increased, when the number task was performed second (Figure 2E).
Conversely, in patients "off" medication this region was increasingly active as UPDRS increased when repeating responses compared with switching responses.
It is likely that relevance and timeliness are more important than easy access as usage increased when the hyperlinks were inserted into patient-specific communication.
In contrast, there was a consistent decrease in %ActiveCSoff as VRmax increased, suggesting that rats were less able to discriminate active and inactive levers as VRmax increased, when there was no information available (Table 4).
Moreover, the use of cornicle secretions was consistent with an altruistic behaviour as it increased when the number of clone-mates benefiting from it, and hence the indirect benefit, was greater.
For example, Zhang et al. (2009 [12]), reported that, the number of predicted AS-NMD candidates increased when these authors included predicted RefSeq ESTs in their analysis.
We regard the transient low CD4 counts as an outcome rather than cause of infection, as the counts increased when the systematic infection was treated.
