The phrase "as implicitly acknowledged" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been recognized or accepted without being explicitly stated.
Example: "The findings of the study, as implicitly acknowledged by the researchers, suggest a need for further investigation."
Alternatives: "as subtly recognized" or "as indirectly accepted".
As we implicitly acknowledged in Lopez, however, Congresss authority to enact laws necessary and proper for the regulation of interstate commerce is not limited to laws directed against economic activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
As Obama implicitly acknowledged, the American middle class has fallen on hard times, saddled with historic levels of debt, skyrocketing health care costs and flat wages.
As even Scalia and Thomas implicitly acknowledged on Monday, that question exists.
The problem, as the judge implicitly acknowledged, is that the defendant is under no obligation to give evidence.
Mix and match Limits to growth Broadcasting uncertainty No, you can't ReprintsIt is true that British voters are angry, disenchanted and bored with the Labour government as Mr Brown's early and silly efforts to portray himself as "the change" implicitly acknowledged.
As President Obama implicitly acknowledged in his recent plan to make attending Community College free for two years, education in America is at a crisis point.
Ms. Kroes implicitly acknowledged as much Wednesday, when she approved a request from Britain to extend recapitalization and credit guarantees for its banking sector that were approved last October.
In recent days, federal officials have acknowledged missteps in communicating the threat posed by the anthrax in the Daschle letter, and have since aggressively stepped up efforts at environmental screening and prevention -- a situation that President Bush implicitly acknowledged as he signed sweeping anti-terrorism legislation at the White House today.
Because the revised 2012 CHCC nomenclature has been widely accepted as an international consensus, its authors implicitly acknowledged that changes may become justified in the future, although they also warned against any precipitation in doing so ('As in the original CHCC, the emphasis was on making changes only when justified').
Not only is it morally indefensible, it doesn't make sense, as the Attorney General and his colleagues have implicitly acknowledged.
