The phrase "as if maximizing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe a hypothetical situation or behavior that suggests an effort to achieve the highest possible outcome.
Example: "The team approached the project as if maximizing their resources would guarantee success."
Alternatives: "as though optimizing" or "as if enhancing".
The first fully explicit argument is given that broadly supports a widespread belief among whole-organism biologists that natural selection tends to lead to organisms acting as if maximizing their inclusive fitness.
In contrast, the character-related rationality assumption predicts that not all the dictators who act as if maximizing their implicit utilities would offer nothing, as shown in the following proposition.
However, close inspection will reveal that this implicit equilibrium is inconsistent with our aforementioned presentation that, when a player who acts as if maximizing his implicit utility chooses a strategy, the characters of other players are irrelevant.
According to the canonical rationality assumption, the rational dictator who acts as if maximizing his self-regarding utility would take advantage of his dominant position and thus choose to offer the recipient nothing.
We accept his argument, based on Grafen's (2002) mathematical analysis, that natural selection leads organisms to act as if maximizing their inclusive fitness.
Therefore, if maximizing the stretch-out is the main goal, the best person to designate as a beneficiary is someone young.
The bill, so punitive, so arbitrary, it was nothing more than a slow, painful ban, by attrition, crafted as if to maximize the most suffering, for the imposition and embarrassment the carriage industry had caused him, by fighting back.
Thus, the matching strategy is as efficient as the maximizing one if they are combined with a mechanism to explore and select a correct definition of state variables.
In our framework, equity emerges in the Ultimatum game as a natural consequence of rational players acting as if they were maximizing their character-related utilities.
Hence, fairness is achieved as a natural consequence of two players acting as if they were maximizing their implicit utilities, whereas in almost all other existing theoretical models it is incorporated explicitly as one of primitive assumptions about people's instincts related to decision making [10], [22], [26], [27].
In contrast to the canonical rationality assumption, the idea underlying this transformation is referred to as the character-related rationality assumption; that is, all players are rational economic agents who act as if they were maximizing their implicit utilities.
