Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(56)
Thus, according to the above criteria, this patient should be diagnosed as having "probable" IgG4-RD.
In their series, 13%% (37/291) of patients were reported as having probable union.
Nevertheless, these patients could be categorized as having probable RCVS by the ICHD-3, beta version (Table 1) [14].
No patient was classified as having probable stabbing headache (code 4.7.1) at initial and follow-up visit.
If the standard criteria were not applied, the remaining 348 patients were subclassified as having probable migraine (115, 19.6%) and unclassified headache (233, 39.7%).
Patients were clinically grouped as having probable primary: (1) nociceptive pain due to a recurrent structural source such as disk protrusion, (2) centrally facilitated pain in absence of a defined structural problem such as fibromyalgia or myofascial pain, or (3) pain from a combination of both categories (recurrent structural plus centrally facilitated).
Nevertheless, and as expected, immunosuppression was strongly associated with proven/putative IPA in our series; however, it is noteworthy that non-immunocompromised patients accounted for one-third of patients classified as having probable infection, all of whom (n = 5/5) eventually died, suggesting putative IPA portends a dismal prognosis even in non-immunocompromised patients.
Similar(4)
Patients not meeting these criteria but with a convincing clinical history were classified as having 'probable narcolepsy'.
Of the 75 patients included in this analysis, in 66 diagnosis was 'definite' according to the ICSD-2 criteria 11 (56 had narcolepsy with cataplexy and 10 had narcolepsy without cataplexy) and nine were classified as having 'probable narcolepsy'.
The analysis of the chart reviews of 200 randomly selected patients who had two ICD-9 coded episodes of gout revealed that 121 were rated by physician consensus as having probable/definite gout.
Applying an SCI cut-off ≤16, 89% of the sample was correctly identified as having 'probable insomnia disorder' (ISI scores of ≥15), while an SCI score of >16 correctly identified 82% of those with 'no insomnia disorder'.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com