The phrase "as false for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear when it could be used due to its lack of grammatical correctness and clarity.
Example: "The statement was deemed as false for its lack of evidence." (Note: This example is not correct due to the phrase itself.)
Alternatives: "as incorrect for" or "as untrue for".
Facts that have been exposed as false, for instance, are rendered "inoperative".
These commercials are just as false, for President Obama is not proposing government-run health care — just a public insurance element in the mix.
Now refutations may be true as well as false: for whenever it is possible to demonstrate something, it is also possible to refute the man who maintains the contradictory of the truth; e.g. if a man has stated that the diagonal is commensurate with the side of the square, one might refute him by demonstrating that it is incommensurate.
Otherwise one problem will be substituted for another, and the sanitary pad revolution will be as false as every advert for feminine hygiene products, all unrealistic white trousers and stupid blue goo.
They portray the future that God will inaugurate as showing up our inferior ideals -- exposing all that humankind settles for (and gets oppressed by) as false substitutes for true peace and true security.
Critics condemned Share Our Wealth as false hope for the poor — "This is not water for the thirsty, but a mirage," Walter Lippmann wrote — but the poor apparently were not dissuaded.
According to data from the Department of Justice, a whopping 97% of rapists receive no punishment, while false accusations only account for an estimated 2 - 6% of rape cases (around the same number as false reports for any other crime).
Some facts were presented as "false impressions": For instance, Goldman Sachs alumni are running Obama's economic policy (think Summers, Patterson, Gensler, Rubin), and Goldman was Obama's biggest campaign contributor.
The act sought to address a practice common in the banking industry in the 1960s and 1970s known as redlining -- denying credit to people based on their neighborhood, race, marital status, last name and a lot of other indicators that served as false proxies for "too risky". Redlining was racist, sexist, deeply unfair and, as our industry would later learn, bad business.
Patients with SA were likely to show up as false positives for MI and vice versa.The SAMISS functioned well as a first-line screening tool for SA/MI in this HIV clinic population.
At the other end, 19% of what Trump says has been classified as "pants on fire" lies and another 41% as false, making for a total of 60% false.
