The phrase "as explicitly acknowledged" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been clearly recognized or stated in a previous context.
Example: "The findings of the study, as explicitly acknowledged in the report, highlight the importance of early intervention."
Alternatives: "as clearly stated" or "as openly recognized".
And if the tail is not part of that lump, then presumably it is also not part of the larger lump of tissue that constitutes the whole cat (as explicitly acknowledged by some anti-extensionalists, e.g. Lowe 2001: 148 and Fine 2003: 198, n. 5, though see Hershenov 2008 for misgivings).
The first of these relates to incomplete or weak data sets used by the studies, as explicitly acknowledged by some study authors, which meant study findings had to be interpreted with caution (Aregawi et al. 2011; Chizema-Kawesha et al. 2010; Jia et al. 2010).
But the principal tone was almost valedictory as Cameron explicitly acknowledged that he is up against the clock.
For, as Reichenbach explicitly acknowledged, gravitation is itself a universal force, coupling to all bodies and affecting them in the same manner (1928, 294 6; 1958, 256 8).
Therefore, a certain amount of correlation exists, as we explicitly acknowledged in the report.
The rationale is to ensure that future interventions, within this context, are aligned with people's actual needs; respecting responsiveness as an explicitly acknowledged intrinsic policy objective of UHC reforms [ 20].
The EU's formal acknowledgement that its external policies were not always concerted towards good health outcomes plays an important role in this policy framework, as it explicitly acknowledged the need to extend its 'health in all policies' commitment to all its external actions.
Most importantly, it would demonstrate that Republicans could not pass a bill, even through the House, without Democratic support, which would substantially reduce their leverage, as Mr Boehner explicitly acknowledged [on Sunday].
Most importantly, it would demonstrate that Republicans could not pass a bill, even through the House, without Democratic support, which would substantially reduce their leverage, as Mr. Boehner explicitly acknowledged in the conference call.
As suggested above, interviewees explicitly acknowledged advantages of CIRBs only rarely, but implicitly potential advantages as well.
The Barth and Martens paper is a bridge between the earlier (quasi-) formal and subsequent informal dialectical theories, and is explicitly acknowledged as a major influence by the Pragma-dialectical theory, the brainchild of Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst (1984).
