Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

as explained from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as explained from" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; a more appropriate phrase would be "as explained in" or "as explained by." Example: "As explained in the previous section, the results indicate a significant improvement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

One reason for this may be that the costumers who wrote the food reviews were less emotional than those who wrote the product reviews, as explained from the following three perspectives: The money spent for a meal in China per person was about 30~100 RMBs on average, but was hundreds of RMBs or more for a product.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

As he explained from the stage of the Joyce Theater on Tuesday night, his company's performances in New York are "about getting as many people together to make the biggest mess that we can".

As he explained from the stage, this was one of the first public screenings of his spectacularly rowdy drag spectacle.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Practically CRST implementation shows three schemes as explained below from [13, 25].

The band gap energies of the nanocomposites, calculated as explained above from plots like that illustrated in Figure 6b, are listed in Table 2.

Gender differences in medical specialty preferences have been explained from structural as well as from individual theories [ 18, 19].

Graham Fitkin's "Hurl" has abstract aims, juxtaposing chunks of music that collide and interact without much development, as Mr. Fitkin explained from the stage.

News & Media

The New York Times

The verb form exit, as explained above, derives from the noun form by conversion (or zero derivation).

A somewhat happier case is the emotions generated by tragedy, as explained by philosophers from Malebranche to Hume.

Science

SEP

Finally, an input that brings together the emotional and cognitive part of the God-image is prayer, or active communication with God, as explained in "Input from prayer" section.

As explained earlier, information from the original pseudogenome alignment is preserved by the annotation step.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "as explained by" or "as explained in" instead of "as explained from". The prepositions "by" and "in" are grammatically correct in this context.

Common error

Avoid using "from" after "explained" when referring to a source. "From" typically indicates origin or departure, not the source of an explanation. Use "by" for people or entities and "in" for documents or publications.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as explained from" functions as a prepositional phrase, intending to link an explanation to its source. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not grammatically correct, as the preposition "from" is inappropriate in this context.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as explained from" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI flags it as incorrect and suggests using "as explained by" or "as explained in" instead. While the intention is to attribute information to a source, the wrong preposition weakens the communication. Always opt for "by" when referencing a person or entity and "in" when citing a document. Despite appearing in various sources, including some authoritative ones, it's crucial to use grammatically sound alternatives to maintain clarity and credibility in writing.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something was clarified by a source?

The correct phrasing is "as explained by" or "as explained in". For example, "as explained by the author" or "as explained in the manual" are both grammatically sound.

Is "as explained from" grammatically correct?

No, "as explained from" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. The correct prepositions to use are "by" or "in" depending on whether you are referring to a person or a document.

Which preposition should I use after "explained": "by", "in", or "from"?

Use "by" when referring to a person or entity that provided the explanation (e.g., "as explained by the teacher"). Use "in" when referring to a document or source where the explanation is found (e.g., "as explained in the book").

What are some alternatives to "as explained from" that I can use in my writing?

Instead of "as explained from", you can use phrases like "according to", "as detailed by", or "clarified by" depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: