The phrase "as explained above in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring back to information or details that have been previously mentioned in the text.
Example: "The results of the experiment were inconclusive, as explained above in the methodology section."
Alternatives: "as detailed earlier in" or "as mentioned previously in".
As explained above, in 1999, the Legislature substantially revised the contest provision of the election code.
As explained above, in plane geometry the area of any polygon can be calculated by dissecting it into triangles.
That is, for as explained above in Section 3.3.
The rotation of the window is then defined as explained above in this section.
Each source node in the network needs a MIMO transmission shot as explained above, in order to deliver its data.
As explained above, in associating successful explanation with the provision of information about statistical relevance relationships, the SR model attempts to accommodate this observation.
Most environmental factors that vary in time also vary in space, and – as explained above – inferences in space (synchronic) are far easier than inferences in time (allochronic).
Then, at each time step, we generate a new page of words, that, as explained above, are in part new words and in part words picked up randomly from already written pages, keeping the balance between text size and vocabulary size via the Heaps'-like law.
Larger proportions of patients with 'Unknown' BMI and smoking status in the raw data study are most likely the result of: contrasting observation period algorithms and differing practice composition between the two data cuts as explained above resulting in less historical data present in newer practices.
Averaging degrees of isolation over the primary clusters in the four stands (as explained above) results in α = 0.185 as the reference level of isolation based on the genetic difference d0.
When analyzing each genotype independently, distance explained 63% 78% of the variance in each line (fig. 6; permutation performed as explained above, p<1.0e−5 in each case).
