as equivalency

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as equivalency" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey a comparison or similarity, but the phrase itself is not commonly used. Example: "The two methods can be evaluated as equivalency in terms of their effectiveness."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It also seems improbable that synergistic killing is responsible, as equivalency with fluoroquinolones would be expected.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Model systems should be required to: exhibit a fluoride dose response (0, 250, 550, 1100 ppm F); run internal controls for all tests (0, 250, gold standard); have sample size sufficient to achieve statistical power for demonstrating equivalence; and use defined statistical methodology to establish equivalency ("as good as") with an appropriate clinical gold standard.

BMC Oral Health

A less clear case arises from a reader, Ira Glasser, who writes about what he sees as false equivalency in a recent Health section piece about the HPV vaccine.

The New York Times

What really infuriates the White House from Mr. Obama on down is what it views as the "equivalency" that the news media draw between Democrats and Republicans on the current deficit debates.

The New York Times

That's been misinterpreted by earnest Lefties as false equivalency–"How can you compare the war crimes and the tens of thousands of deaths caused by one side to shrill protests by CodePink on the other side?" they cry.

Vice

Media critics and the objects of their criticism have spent the last few weeks bickering over such issues as false equivalency, how the expectations of the race have ended up getting exceptionally bent out of whack, and who, ultimately, takes the blame for the way GOP presidential nominee and enraged eczema blister Donald Trump has been covered.

Huffington Post

The other congeners were expressed as toxic equivalency (TEQ) and compared to TCDD using international toxic equivalency factors.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Although not designed as an equivalency trial, GC has become the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma in many institutions.

Annals of Oncology

However, patients undergoing elective major orthopedic surgery associated with severe postoperative morbidity (including cardiac ischemic events) may not able to undergo this or other subjective measures of cardiorespiratory reserve, such as metabolic equivalency tests (METs) [ 3, 4], since mobility in these patients may be limited [ 5].

BMC Anesthesiology

In past years, city and state officials released separate graduation numbers, with the city including students who had earned special education diplomas and General Equivalency Diplomas as well as August graduates.

The New York Times

In addition to guidance, health and discipline, he oversees all of the city's alternative schools and high school equivalency programs as well as attendance and anti-truancy efforts, after-school programs, substance abuse prevention, child abuse and domestic violence prevention and even a counseling program for children and families affected by the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to express a relationship of equivalence, use grammatically standard phrases such as "as equivalent" or "in terms of equivalency" instead of "as equivalency".

Common error

Avoid using the noun "equivalency" directly after "as" when you need an adjective. "As" typically introduces a comparison, and "equivalent" (the adjective) better serves this purpose.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as equivalency" attempts to function as a comparative, suggesting a relationship of equivalence or similarity. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form would typically involve using the adjective "equivalent" instead of the noun "equivalency" directly after "as".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as equivalency" is considered grammatically incorrect. While the intent is to establish a comparison based on equivalence, standard English dictates using "as equivalent" or rephrasing to "in terms of equivalency". Ludwig AI highlights the issue. Although it appears in diverse sources, opting for grammatically sound alternatives enhances clarity and credibility, particularly in formal writing. Correctness and clarity should always be a priority, given that multiple alternative and more common phrases can be equally or more effective.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as equivalent

Replaces the noun "equivalency" with the adjective "equivalent", creating a grammatically correct comparison.

in terms of equivalency

Adds context by specifying that the comparison relates to equivalency.

as a form of equivalence

Specifies that something functions as a type of equivalence.

regarding equivalence

Focuses on the topic of equivalence.

with respect to equivalency

Emphasizes the aspect of equivalency under consideration.

considered equivalent

States that something is deemed equivalent.

seen as equivalent

Highlights the perception of equivalence.

as a matter of equivalence

Indicates that the equivalence is a key point.

on the basis of equivalence

Emphasizes the foundation of the equivalence.

based on their equivalency

Indicates the reason is their equivalency.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "as equivalency" to be grammatically correct?

You can use alternatives like "as equivalent", "in terms of equivalency", or "regarding equivalence" depending on the intended meaning.

What is the difference between "as equivalency" and "as equivalence"?

"As equivalency" is not standard English. "As equivalence" is slightly better but still awkward. It's more common and clear to use "as equivalent" or specify the context, such as "in terms of equivalence".

Is "as equivalency" ever appropriate to use?

While technically understandable, "as equivalency" is not considered standard English. It's best to avoid it in formal writing and opt for clearer, more conventional phrasing.

What does "as equivalency" mean in the context of scientific studies?

In scientific contexts, "as equivalency" (though grammatically incorrect) likely aims to express that two or more things are being compared in terms of their equivalence. However, it's better to say "as equivalent" or specify the measurement, such as "in terms of toxic equivalency".