The phrase "as either strong" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to compare strength but lacks clarity and completeness.
Example: "The results of the experiment were as either strong or weak as expected, depending on the variables involved."
Alternatives: "as strong as" or "either as strong".
The precipitation hardening component of yield strength is modeled for conditions where precipitates act as either strong or weak obstacles.
FP tails can be classified as either "strong" or "weak", depending on the melting temperature and free energy of the hairpin structure.
Its modification heavily affects the adsorption behaviour and can turn the same structure to behave as either strong water reducer or workability extender, with a limited effect on the heat signature of the cement paste.
A group of nine colonies, in sets of three, identified as either strong, failing, or collapsed, were sampled and analyzed.
We used the classification functions generated in our original discriminant function analysis from 2007 to classify these new samples as either strong, failing, collapsed, or out-group reference based on virus and Nosema patterns.
In the BID database, the alanine mutations were listed as either "strong", "intermediate", "weak" or "insignificant".
Twelve of these compounds were identified as being either strong inhibitors of both LmARG and HsARGI or differential inhibitors between the two enzymes.
LC50 estimates are hard to classify as being either heritable or as products of either strong or weak selection because it depends on whether the specific population shares an exposure history with the pesticide.
There was no evaluation of the CCR2 staining intensity in positive macrophages as staining was either strong or absent similar to CD68 staining.
In contrast, when the total concentration of gene products is high, the network was shifted into the bistable regime, exhibiting the two Attractors 1 and 2, as expected (Figure 2); either strong expression of Operon 1 with strong repression of Operon 2 (Attractor 1), or vice versa (Attractor 2).
Each group of papers was graded as providing either: stronger evidence (generally consistent findings in multiple higher quality studies); weaker evidence (generally consistent findings in one higher quality study and lower quality studies, or in multiple lower quality studies).; inconsistent evidence (<75% consistency findings in multiple studies) or very limited evidence (a single study).
