The phrase "as either correct or wrong" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the validity or accuracy of a statement, idea, or action.
Example: "The results of the experiment can be evaluated as either correct or wrong based on the data collected."
Alternatives: "as either right or wrong" or "as either valid or invalid".
Maskiewicz and Lineback imply that labeling students' ideas as misconceptions essentially classifies these ideas as either right or wrong, with no intermediate stages for constructivist refinement.
It suggests that following either correct or wrong nucleotide incorporation opposite the cross-linked G, further extension might occur at a comparable rate.
Indeed, extension of a G A or A C mismatch occurred more efficiently by KF (exo–) than either the correct or wrong base-pair with S-cdG or S-cdA (Table 7).
Four physiotherapists blinded to the patients and to each other rated the test performances as either correct or not correct.
Consequently, the student is not corrected or scored by the computer, which is an important difference from verification feedback such as "correct" or "wrong answer, try again".
In the last paragraph make a small conclusion where you should sum up everything you have written and give your final stand on the results: whether the hypothesis was demonstrated as correct or wrong.
Following a method developed by Leiserowitz, Smith, and Marlon (2010), responses were scored as either right (1) or wrong (0) and indexed (0 13) based on the number of correct answers, where more correct answers reflect higher knowledge.
The selection of wrong answer alternatives and/or the omission of correct answer alternatives, in contrast, signify that a student does not yet possess the conceptual understanding necessary to solve the item correctly and the respective item is scored 0. Consequently, an item is either correct (1) or wrong (0).
