The phrase "as data retention" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing policies, practices, or regulations related to the storage and management of data over time.
Example: "The company must comply with legal requirements as data retention policies dictate how long customer information should be stored."
Alternatives: "regarding data retention" or "in terms of data retention".
But so long as data retention is required by FISA and the Patriot Act, we will never be able to control our data.
Some changes may be big, such as data retention and privacy by design, while some may be more straightforward, such as providing privacy notices.
Such laws exist in nations including the UK, France and Germany, and they provide a fundamental level of transparency that is greatly needed, especially now that such a deeply intrusive approach such as data retention is imposed on the entire Australian population.
To overcome the scaling limit of floating gate NAND structures, a charge trap flash (CTF -based structure is believed to show promise even though it still has issues, such as data retention and slow program erase, due to its unique gate stack structure.
This is referred to as data retention noise. .
Although being a most promising memory element, critical issues for the future development of RRAM devices are reliable, such as data retention and memory endurance [125].
The tunnel barrier engineering technology is expected to provide faster programming and erasing (P/E) speeds as well as longer data retention for next generation non-volatile memory (NVM) devices.
The U.S. and the EU are in talks about a Data Protection Umbrella Agreement that "is expected to cover issues such as bulk collection of data by law enforcement agencies — which would be limited to specific purposes — as well as reduce data retention limits, and give EU citizens a right of judicial redress in the U.S. if they suspect their personal data is being misused".
As well as indiscriminate data retention, the court objected to DRIPA's failure to limit access to the data to the prevention and detection of serious crime; to the legislation allowing police and public bodies to authorize their own access to the data; to the law not requiring that people be notified after their data was accessed; and not requiring that data be kept in the EU.
Today an open letter signed by fifteen of Internet law academics has slammed the government's claim for DRIP being 'business as usual data retention legislation' as "false" — arguing that the legislation does indeed extend state surveillance powers through a significant expansion of UK interception powers overseas.
Today an open letter signed by fifteen of Internet law academics has slammed the government's claim for DRIP being 'business as usual data retention legislation' as "false" — arguing that the legislation does indeed extend state surveillance powers through a significant expansion of UK interception powers overseas.
