A weakened economy since the 2008 recession hurt global demand and trade at the same time that steamship lines continued to build more and larger vessels — immense ships that were conceived as cost-effective when freight costs were higher several years ago.
This criteria considered a strategy as "cost-effective" when the ICER was less than three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and as "very cost-effective" if the ICER was less than the GDP per capita [42, 43].
Accordingly the objective of the presented manuscript is to determine at which effect size and at which cost next generation AVDs will be regarded as cost-effective when compared to the current practice (best supportive care) for treating blind patients with RP from a German healthcare payer perspective.
Moreover, enrichment of thousands of loci is still very expensive and as such only cost effective, when huge data sets (>96 species) are analyzed.
Recently, however, doubts have been raised as to whether the strategy was cost effective when compared with standard care.
Ranibizumab could therefore be regarded as very cost-effective when its cost per QALY was less than about $50,000, and cost effective when this ratio was less than about $130,000.
Interventions were considered to be highly cost effective when they had ratios that fell below the per capita GDP and were regarded as being potentially cost effective if they had ratios between one and three times per capita GDP.
However, taxis can be cost effective when shared.
They are more cost effective when purchased by the thousands.
Systematic HBV screening in patients with solid tumors may not be as cost-effective as chemotherapy when the HBVR and the prevalence of HBV are low [ 23].
Within the model, screening women is as least as cost effective as screening men when female prevalence is at or beyond around 80percentnt of male prevalence.
