The phrase "as corrected for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to adjustments or modifications made to something, often in a technical or analytical context.
Example: "The final report was submitted as corrected for the errors identified during the review process."
Alternatives: "as adjusted for" or "as modified for".
He was studying the relationship between the spectral classification of stars and their actual brightness as corrected for distance their absolute magnitude.
ACPR was expressed as corrected for these results (ACPRp), to include patients who were late clinical and/or parasitological failures but who had a new infection and no recrudescence of the original infection.
Urinary concentrations of the biomarkers were examined both as micrograms per liter and as corrected for creatinine (micrograms per gram creatinine; μg/gC) to normalize for urine dilution.
The π-value for binding associated with any one gene, as corrected for genomic imbalance, will be given by p _ f u l l = p (1 − π ) p (1 − 2 π ) + π where p is the p-value (1-Platt score) and p_full is the p-value for the genome.
The multivariable aggregated analyses identified four pairwise interactions at the P<0.05 level: sex and anatomic subsite P-value=0.002 P-value=0.002x (P-vagee=0.003), and and anatomic sexsite P-value=0.003 P-value=0.003d histologic type (P-vagee=0.013), with only the first two standsticanatomicnificant asubsitected P-value=0.011 P-value=0.011
The p-value associated for any one gene as corrected for genomic imbalance will be given by p _ f u l l = p (1 − π ) p (1 − 2 π ) + π where p is the p-value (1-Platt score) in the sample and p_ full is the p-value for the genome.
The procedure accounted for the broadening of the positron implantation probe as a function of energy as well as correcting for the increase in positron implantation depths due to the presence of a lower density at the surface region.
The conflation of these two factors presents an analytical challenge as correcting for multiple testing risks reducing true biological signal.
Additional functions were also used, such as correcting for rotation axis offset and making use of a region of interest in each image to correct for X-ray intensity fluctuations.
As correcting for incomplete follow-back increases the survival time for pseudo-DCIs, the effect is to reduce the hazard ratio relative to RIL cases, so the corrected hazard ratio then observed Rcorrected is actually (1/Rfollow-back) × Rselection.
We presume this is a result of achieving a more accurate stimulus-response curve by employing a wider range of stimuli (changes B and C above) as well as correcting for background movement (change D).
