Sentence examples for as compared with the prevalence from inspiring English sources

It is of interest that the prevalence of hypermobility was twice as high in children with DCD (64%) as compared with the prevalence of hypermobility in both the random and matched TD groups, which was also rather high (33%).

Using MRI, Hill and colleagues [ 16] evaluated the prevalence of ACL rupture in knees with symptomatic OA as compared with the prevalence in those without OA, and the relationship to pain and recalled injury.

The study reports prevalence of (presumably neonatal) seizures of 6.4% for term infants with five-minute Apgar score < 7 as compared with the prevalence of 0.09% among infants with scores in 7 10 range (relative risk = 719595% CI: 64 74).

The CPs recruited a higher proportion of patients with the relatively favourable tumour stages 1 and 2, 87% of the cases, as compared with the 78% prevalence in the regional population (global χ-test for all 5 stages: 14.7, d.f. 4, P<0.01), but the picture was more complex.

As compared with the baseline HIV adult prevalence of 1.72% (rural 1.64%, urban 1.89%) [ 18], the incidence rate per 100 person-years was 7.3% of the baseline prevalence.

The lower MRSA-persistent carrier prevalence in the total study population (9.7%) as compared with the average cross-sectional MRSA prevalence (17.6%) indicates that carriage of LA-MRSA is fleeting and varies within individuals.

The overall possible asthma prevalence in respondents and non-respondents combined would then have been 9.0% if non-respondents had higher prevalence than respondents, and 8.8% if they had lower prevalence, as compared with the 8.9% we found among respondents.

In model 1 the overall asthma prevalence in respondents and non-respondents combined would then have been 9.7% if non-respondents had higher prevalence than respondents, and 8.3% if they had lower prevalence, as compared with the 9.0% we found among respondents.

63 The Empirical-2006/Reeves case definition led to a tenfold prevalence estimate as compared with the CDC1994/Fukuda definition, 64 probably due to misclassification and inclusion of patients with major depressive disorder.

Estimates which extrapolated those false negatives and false positives to the general population indicated a prevalence rate of 18.5% as compared with the 8.1% reported by the Census.

The number of underlying individual transcript alignments exhibiting a specific splicing variation may reflect the in vivo prevalence of the variation as compared with the number of transcripts exhibiting a mutually exclusive variation.