Sentence examples for as compared with the expected from inspiring English sources

Table 1 shows the number of specialists correctly selecting the LARS score issues, as compared with the expected number if they picked at random.

Overall, the physical components summarised by the PCS score were reduced as compared with the expected score for the age-matched and gender-matched general population.

When ranking diseases according to effect size, i.e. the over-/under-representation of TF binding as compared with the expected value for that disease, a set of autoimmune diseases, including arteritis and spondylitis scored highest.

Hospital mortality ratios (95% confidence interval) [ 28] were 0.65 (0.48–0.87) and 0.69 (0.51–0.92), as compared with the expected mortality calculated from APACHE II and SAPS II scores, respectively.

As adaptation toward translational efficiency is correlated with tRNA abundance, we examined which are the most frequently used codons in the highly expressed CYTB gene as compared with the expected random codons usage (equal distribution).

Upon admission to the surgical intensive care unit the mean cholesterol level was only 119 ± 44 mg/dl, as compared with the expected normal cholesterol level (taken from a database) of 201 ± 17 mg/dl (P < 0.001).

The standard becomes the expected value of outcomes after declining the RCT (usual care) as compared with the average expected value of outcomes after accepting the trial.

Together, these results demonstrate that both achiasmate X univalents are deposited into the first polar body in 40% of him-8 embryos as compared with the 25% expected from random segregation.

The ROCs in the cross-validations all have area under curve (AUC) between 0.717 to 0.999 as compared with the randomly expected AUC of 0.5, indicative of high sensitivity and specificity of the decision trees in predicting the phenotypes (Fig. 1C).

And some research suggests that institutions providing mammograms mainly to black patients miss as many as half of breast cancers compared with the expected detection rates at academic hospitals.

The system reached the F-score of 88.06% for the CEM task and 88.71% for the CDI task, which can be regarded as a very competitive result compared with the expected upper boundary, i.e., the agreement between two human annotators, i.e., 91% [3].