The phrase "as compared to scheme" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when making a comparison between two different concepts, plans, or systems, highlighting the differences or similarities.
Example: "The new design is more efficient as compared to scheme A, which had several limitations."
Alternatives: "in contrast to the scheme" or "relative to the scheme".
As a result, this scheme improves network lifetime as compared to the existing schemes.
It has been observed that the high-level abstraction obtained with ORSM has better generalization performance on unseen data as compared to other topic modeling schemes.
A high frequency becomes even more important in case providers experience uncertainty regarding the net gains of improvement efforts (as in relative schemes) because, compared to schemes involving little uncertainty, possible gains will be discounted at higher rates.
While for 1-coverage, the 3D scheme is less efficient than the 2D scheme, the performance of 3D scheme improves significantly as compared to 2D scheme for k-coverage, for values of k is larger than 1.
Numerical results show that the scheme achieves significant energy saving as compared to a scheme that includes only a sleeping policy and does not consider pre-detection.
Hence, it can be inferred that less number of links get exposed in our scheme as compared to other schemes when same number of nodes are captured by the adversary.
For the transmission of 2 Kb data file, the CR takes only 84.5 milliseconds (ms) while the random channel selection scheme requires 149.5 ms which is twice higher as compared to CSPA scheme.
To transmit a data file of size 2 Kb, by using the CSPA the CR needs to perform channel switching only 7 times while the random channel selection scheme requires 39 switchings which is almost 5.5 times higher as compared to CSPA scheme.
Our experiments with real-world cosmology simulations on production systems indicate that the proposed DistDLB scheme can effectively improve the performance of cosmology simulations by 2.56 79.14% as compared to the scheme that does not consider the heterogeneous and dynamic features of distributed systems.
For example, to transmit the file size of 25 kb MMF requires 35 kW transmission power, whereas the FEPO scheme transmits the same file with transmission power of 25 kW, which is significantly lower power as compared to MMF scheme.
