Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "as compared to device" is not correct in standard written English.
It can be used when making a comparison between two items, but it requires additional context or clarification to be meaningful.
Example: "The performance of the new software is significantly better as compared to the device we used last year."
Alternatives: "in comparison to the device" or "relative to the device".
Exact(1)
Water-covered endurance characteristics of devices made with nanorod layer exhibit superior switching performance as compared to device without nanorods layer, shown in Fig. 17b, d, respectively [256].
Similar(59)
In both cases, the mobility of graphene increased several-fold, as compared to devices on bare SiO2.
Indeed, devices containing DIO additive show improved initial device performance of 7.7 % as compared to devices not containing the additive 3.4%%.
Devices with the recombination distributed throughout the emissive layer show improved performance metrics, particularly in efficiency roll-off as compared to devices with the recombination pinned at the host/transport layer interfaces.
Furthermore, ZnO nanoparticles (≤ 100 nm) had been added in the (P3HT + PCBM) active layer of the hybrid organic solar cell to increase the electron mobility in the active layer leading to a remarkable increase in PCE as compared to devices without nanoparticles [19].
Approximately 7% improvement of I on can be accomplished for pMOSFETs filled with ALD W using SiH4 (703 μA/μm at V ds = V gs = −1.0 V), as compared to devices filled with ALD W using B2H6 (580 μA/μm at V ds = V gs = −1.0 V).
This explains the better sensitivity and faster switching of the photocurrent in the Schottky barrier devices as compared to the device with ohmic contact on both sides.
It is noticed that nearly all numbers in bold letters are positive indicating that the higher reduction can be achieved with semi-active devices as compared to passive device.
However, the space-charge limited current region (R2) for D2 device is low as compared to D1 device.
The UV photodetection device developed using DBH yields photoresponsivity 80 times higher as compared to NBH device under UV illumination (325 nm).
Thus, the Schottky diode shows much faster switching under pulsed UV illumination as compared to the device with ohmic contacts on both the sides.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com