The phrase "as compared to comparison" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to attempt to draw a distinction or make a comparison, but the wording is awkward and redundant.
Example: "The results of the study were surprising, as compared to comparison with previous research."
Alternatives: "in contrast to" or "when compared to".
The interaction was due to participants with AS recalling significantly fewer enacted items compared to comparison participants (mean diff. = .14; p<.009), whereas the proportion of the observed items was comparable in the two groups (mean diff. = −.018; p = .958) (Figure 2).
Results from Malawi's expanded Mchinji Cash Transfer programme show the percentage of children newly enrolled in school more than twice as high in intervention households (8.3%) compared to comparison households (3.4%; p <0.001).
An additional benefit from interpopulation comparisons as compared to interspecific comparisons is that the former allow adopting approaches to separate the relative roles of genetic drift and natural selection on observed differentiation [e.g. [ 18, 19]].
However, the specificity of mnemonic benefits to related P1s shows that reminding instructions do not prompt learners to more deeply encode all the stimuli as compared to the comparison condition.
We calculated descriptive statistics and then conducted logistic regression analysis to report attendance in the intervention group as compared to the comparison group while controlling for potential confounders.
We calculated descriptive statistics and then conducted logistic regression analysis to report attendance in the intervention group as compared to the comparison group.
Results showed an increased level of alcohol-related knowledge in the intervention group (p < .005) as compared to the comparison group at one-year follow-up.
The intervention group also showed significant improvement in the stages-of-change measure as compared to the comparison group at end-point (Coefficient = 3.37, p < .001).001
The results showed that all risk-tested patients, even those in the low-risk group, had greater rates of follow-up visits as compared to the comparison group.
