Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
Fisher's exact probability test as appropriate Table 5 Significant factors for severe anemia at admission identified by multivariate analysis (R2 = 0.064) Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P value Age ( ≥85 years) 1.80 (0.05–3.08) 0.0316 Type of fracture (trochanteric) 3.16 (1.61–6.20) 0.0008 In-hospital mortality (in-hospital death) 0.42 (0.14–1.28) NS NS Not significant.
Comparative sequences from GenBank were also included as appropriate (Table S1).
For the analysis of cell differentials in BAL, functional assays, and cavity sizes, the paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the change from baseline to 16 weeks within each treatment group (Table 2), and one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the change from baseline to 16 weeks between treatment groups, as appropriate (Table 3).
Diagnoses were established by history, serology and culture, as appropriate (Table 1).
In patients receiving prophylactic antimicrobials 671 52.46%) of 1279 prescription were evaluated as appropriate (Table 3).
Comparisons were made by using the chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, as appropriate (Table).
Similar(48)
For formal hypothesis testing, we used the Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact test, or the Pearson chi-square test as appropriate (Tables 1, 2, 3).
Group comparisons between patients with and without a MEF50 < 60%% of predicted were performed using Fisher's exact test or Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate (Tables 1 and 2).
Comparison of continuous and categorical independent variables was performed between patients who attended the pre-dialysis clinic and those who did not using t-test, Mann-Whitney, and chi-square analyses as appropriate (Tables 1 and 2; see Additional file Table 1 and Additional file Table 2).
A Fisher's exact test was used for testing relationships between categorical variables (contingency tables) as appropriate.
Ordinal variables were summarized by frequency distribution of scores and by summary statistics on the scores or shift tables, as appropriate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com